Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: highly laughable

  1. #1
    Chasing Prey
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,125
    Canada

    Thumbs down highly laughable

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080131/...wh/bush_budget


    he cuts virtually all domestic programs in favor of what? NOTHING


    so basically we're paying for his mistakes in order to get out of a 400 billion dollar deficit.


    "i envision a surplus" of what? dumb ass people like yourself?



    In his State of the Union address Monday, Bush said his budget envisioned a surplus in 2012. "American families have to balance their budgets, and so should their government," he said. no idea how in god's name that'll happen with the hole he's digging.

    i got a better way to make the deficit shrink by 500 million by the time the election is over..........bring all the troops home. maybe lower pirces on things we buy? just a thought


    Savings also would come by charging wealthier people higher monthly premiums for Medicare's drug program. wont happen because then he'd be paying more
    Last edited by acealive1; 31-Jan-2008 at 10:01 PM.

  2. #2
    has the velocity Mike70's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,543
    Canada
    bush is just such a huge joke and not a particularly good one either. thankfully we have less than a year to put with his stupidity.
    "The bumps you feel are asteroids smashing into the hull."

  3. #3
    Banned Khardis's Avatar
    Banned User

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    821
    Undisclosed
    Yes lets fix everything by abandoning Iraq and then "lowering the prices on things we buy" I don't recall the president having that particular power, you would think that they (Presidents) would do that all the time since it would be the best way to get re-elected.

  4. #4
    Chasing Prey
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,125
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Khardis View Post
    Yes lets fix everything by abandoning Iraq and then "lowering the prices on things we buy" I don't recall the president having that particular power, you would think that they (Presidents) would do that all the time since it would be the best way to get re-elected.

    lower prices means people will buy more and in turn the defecit will shrink because we're not digging that much further. they should try lowering gas prices to $1.25 for a solid 14 days and see how much the economy shoots up and also how much more things get purchased. they'd take a hit but its not unlike anything else that'd go on sale,u take a hit to maximize profit in order to sell more

    Quote Originally Posted by scipio70 View Post
    bush is just such a huge joke and not a particularly good one either. thankfully we have less than a year to put with his stupidity.


    agreed
    Last edited by acealive1; 31-Jan-2008 at 10:39 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  5. #5
    Banned Khardis's Avatar
    Banned User

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    821
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by acealive1 View Post
    lower prices means people will buy more and in turn the defecit will shrink because we're not digging that much further. they should try lowering gas prices to $1.25 for a solid 14 days and see how much the economy shoots up and also how much more things get purchased. they'd take a hit but its not unlike anything else that'd go on sale,u take a hit to maximize profit in order to sell more
    Oh I agree lower prices = more purchase power of the public... but... I dunno. I must have missed it in Civics class, where did the President get the power to lower prices in a free market economy?

  6. #6
    Chasing Prey
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,125
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Khardis View Post
    Oh I agree lower prices = more purchase power of the public... but... I dunno. I must have missed it in Civics class, where did the President get the power to lower prices in a free market economy?


    they regulated prices on snacks...so why not gas?

  7. #7
    Banned Khardis's Avatar
    Banned User

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    821
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by acealive1 View Post
    they regulated prices on snacks...so why not gas?
    Where do they regulate prices on snacks? Which snakes, who regulates them?

    Gas is a commodity which is sold by many multinational companies. The president tells companies from South America, OPEC, China, Russia, and such that they cant sell their gas unless its for a 1.25 when they spend more than a 1.25 to get it to our market, will create what we call an economic melt down. Since they would rather not sell it to us and sell it to China say then to be brutalized economically by people who don't understand $$$ or economics.

  8. #8
    Chasing Prey clanglee's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Fort Mill SC
    Age
    49
    Posts
    3,134
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by acealive1 View Post
    [url]Savings also would come by charging wealthier people higher monthly premiums for Medicare's drug program. wont happen because then he'd be paying more
    Not to mention the fact that Wealthier people don't need or use Medicare. They can afford better health plans usually.
    "When the dead walk, we must stop the killing, or lose the war."

  9. #9
    Banned Khardis's Avatar
    Banned User

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    821
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by clanglee View Post
    Not to mention the fact that Wealthier people don't need or use Medicare. They can afford better health plans usually.
    They should just let them opt out of it, as in cant use it, don't have to pay for it.

  10. #10
    Dying Minerva_Zombi's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hopkinsville, Ky
    Age
    35
    Posts
    394
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by Khardis View Post
    They should just let them opt out of it, as in cant use it, don't have to pay for it.

    This guy is really...really stupid. I think that pretty much sums that up for me. Go hug Ann Coulter's nuts some more and shut the **** up.

  11. #11
    Chasing Prey clanglee's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Fort Mill SC
    Age
    49
    Posts
    3,134
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Khardis View Post
    They should just let them opt out of it, as in cant use it, don't have to pay for it.
    They can, and do, opt out of it. But that brings no more money in of course.
    "When the dead walk, we must stop the killing, or lose the war."

  12. #12
    Banned Khardis's Avatar
    Banned User

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    821
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by Minerva_Zombi View Post
    This guy is really...really stupid. I think that pretty much sums that up for me. Go hug Ann Coulter's nuts some more and shut the **** up.
    I am confused, which part of letting the rich opt out of using medicare etc is hugging ann coulters nuts? The logic or the fairness?

    Quote Originally Posted by clanglee View Post
    They can, and do, opt out of it. But that brings no more money in of course.
    Yeah but they don't use it either. So that takes no money out.
    Last edited by Khardis; 01-Feb-2008 at 01:44 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  13. #13
    Rising kortick's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Lampshade Leather Bar
    Posts
    1,059
    United States
    There is no way the budget is going to be balanced
    not with this war going on

    and we cant just pull out of iraq, it will leave it too
    unstable and if say iran or saudi gets control of the
    oil fields it will be even worse.

    Technically the president could lower gas prices
    but it would only be thru using our reserves instead of importing
    or cutting all state and federal tax on gas
    it would lower the price and people would buy more stuff but the
    loss of tax dollars would be disastrous.

    we have to get out of iraq by getting them to take
    control of their own country.

    nothing will change after the election anyways
    people blame congress for not doing anything
    but the truth is everytime they try to pass a bill
    bush just vetos it and they dont have a 66% majority
    to override his veto, so bush is still doing what he wants
    and congress is unable to change things.

    Khardis may be strongly opinionated but he is not stupid
    there are things he says i agree with and some i dont
    but that is the case with most people.
    besides when he gets a good rant going its showtime....

  14. #14
    Chasing Prey
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,125
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by kortick View Post
    There is no way the budget is going to be balanced
    not with this war going on

    and we cant just pull out of iraq, it will leave it too
    unstable and if say iran or saudi gets control of the
    oil fields it will be even worse.
    do u even know what you just said?

    if thats true,then gas should be $50 a gallon after we left iraq the first time in the early 90's they arent babies,they can take care of themselves without help from us

  15. #15
    Rising kortick's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Lampshade Leather Bar
    Posts
    1,059
    United States
    Ace

    Gulf war I we removed Iraq from kuwiat so
    saddam didnt control thier oil fields

    once kuwait was liberated we left the area

    this war we totally destroyed the country and killed
    its leaders and the whole government.
    Plus we didnt occupy their country for 5 years
    last time either.

    it is a complete 100% difference

    there is no way to compare dessert storm
    with this disaster of a war

    we didnt destroy them last time
    we put embargos on them that nobody really enforced
    that is why oil didnt go up

    this is a whole new ball game.

    I can't even begin to imagine how you can compare the
    two situations. You really don't see them as being
    the same do you?

    (btw- Hard Times from Dynasty playing)
    Last edited by kortick; 01-Feb-2008 at 07:00 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •