Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: John Carpenters 'The Ward' start shooting on Monday!!

  1. #16
    Chasing Prey MoonSylver's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Oh
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,475
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by DubiousComforts View Post
    It wasn't the critics -- everyone seemed to hate The Thing when it was released. I was in high school and can't recall a single person my age actually liking it at that time.

    The Thing came out during the summer of Poltergeist and at the height of transformation-mania where every horror film seemed to be built around show-stopping make-up effects. The Thing was well-promoted on TV, but simply lost in the mix. It's doubtful that positive critical reviews would have influenced audience opinion among all the competition that year.
    I think I was in middle school at the time & LOVED it (though I caught it on cable...I don't even remember being AWARE of it's theatrical release.)

    Then again, I was different than kids my age...

    Even though I know it wasn't well regarded back then it just seems unfathomable to me now...

  2. #17
    Dead Doc's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Harlingen, Texas
    Age
    31
    Posts
    700
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by bassman View Post
    I know BTILC is supposed to be cheesy, but I just can't enjoy it.
    When I was younger, I loved it. But, seeing it again if it weren't for Kurt Russel's character I would probably, change the channel.



    Quote Originally Posted by bassman View Post
    In my mind, Carpenter has only made three great films. The Thing, Starman, and They Live. The rest are just tolerable or absolutely horrible.....
    Starman- Yeah. loved it! His best 80s work imo.

    The Thing- Nope, never digged it much. Sorry.

    They Live- Man, this film had potential. Great Premises but, it just got siller and siller as, it went along. I think this film needs a remake!

  3. #18
    Dying C5NOTLD's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    412
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by DubiousComforts View Post
    It wasn't the critics -- everyone seemed to hate The Thing but simply lost in the mix. It's doubtful that positive critical reviews would have influenced audience opinion among all the competition that year.
    The Thing also competed against E.T. which didn't help much.
    Last edited by C5NOTLD; 06-Aug-2009 at 10:56 PM.

  4. #19
    Being Attacked
    Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Nevada
    Age
    64
    Posts
    82
    Undisclosed
    The base where the Thing takes place also didn't have one chick stationed on it--which was probably realistic for time period--but the movie lacks a certain tension with an all male cast, plus the idea of an all male anything in this day and age must seems kind of goofy to contemporary movie watchers.

  5. #20
    Zombie Flesh Eater EvilNed's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,310
    Undisclosed
    Actually I welcomed the complete absence of romantic or sexual tension in any form.

  6. #21
    Being Attacked
    Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Nevada
    Age
    64
    Posts
    82
    Undisclosed
    Boy-girl tension doesn't do much for me either. I would love to see an remake of Carpenter's The Thing with an all female cast.

  7. #22
    Feeding shootemindehead's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    4,077
    Ireland
    Quote Originally Posted by DubiousComforts View Post
    It wasn't the critics -- everyone seemed to hate The Thing when it was released. I was in high school and can't recall a single person my age actually liking it at that time.

    The Thing came out during the summer of Poltergeist and at the height of transformation-mania where every horror film seemed to be built around show-stopping make-up effects. The Thing was well-promoted on TV, but simply lost in the mix. It's doubtful that positive critical reviews would have influenced audience opinion among all the competition that year.
    As far as I recall, it was 'E.T.' that scuppered the box office success of 'The Thing', as has been mentioned. Why that was, I have no idea. It's not exactly aimed at the same audience. 'E.T.' was a PG cert and 'The Thing' was an 18's cert over here.

    I think a lot of critics disliked the fact that it bore no resemblance to the original. Which, in my book, dosen't make sense either. As Stephen King mentioned, Carpenter's 'The Thing' was far superior to the version with James Arness, who was basically a "...walking Carrot".

    Anyway, 'The Thing' went through the roof, over here in ireland, with the kids I grew up with. Everyone wanted to see it, AFAIR. I remember thinking it was the "best film" I ever saw at the time.

    I'm runnin' this monkey farm now Frankenstein.....

  8. #23
    Being Attacked Bone Daddy's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    56
    Undisclosed
    Its good to see JC back in action. I admit, I'm an unabashed JC fan,but his body of work is filled with both hit and misses. I've seen just about all of his films,save for Halloween and Assault on Pct 13 in theaters, so I tend to view his work in a more positive, nostalgic light.
    I have always looked upon decay as being just as wonderful and rich an expression of life as growth~
    Henry Miller

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •