Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: is this really Guns n Roses?

  1. #16
    Team Rick MinionZombie's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Mandatorium
    Posts
    24,222
    UK
    I actually liked this new track by the name of "Better" ... however, all the other leaked tracks from last year were utter sh*te on a stick made of sh*te.

    It's not true GnR, it's Axl with a cover band adding some new (literally) sh*t to their track list.

    Axl should have just let it lie and go and do something else instead - and whatever that might have been, done it quicker ... and hasn't he had plastic surgery recently? I remember seeing a photo and he looked a bloody shock!

  2. #17
    Inverting The Cross MikePizzoff's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Age
    39
    Posts
    4,928
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by RJ_Sevin View Post
    I have no use for the attitude that artists should not change and move forward, that they should never take risks or attempt some kind of transformation. Great moments can't be recaptured -- they can only be imitated. I prefer the real thing -- in this case, the perfect Appetite for Destruction -- to an imitation, and I applaud Axl for trying something different.
    I agree artists should evolve and move forward, musically, but keep the same friggin formula, at least!!! I can't stand when bands change they're formula and can't pull off the new one.

    GnR were a rock n roll band... this new stuff is NOT rock n roll.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •