 Originally Posted by MinionZombie
My take is - the only way to kill a zombie, is shoot the fucker in the head - how are you going to manage that, one of the most basic and necessary elements of the zombie genre, with a PG-13 rating? 
Plus the fact that zombies like to eat people ... and that they're rotting corpses walking around. Vampires just get frozen in the time at which they were bitten, so you can easily make them look like Ashley Greene (meow!  ), but zombies are so not that kind of movie monster that can be prettied up. If you try to put some lipstick and eyeliner on a zombie they'll either bite your hand off, or their eyes and lips will fall off. 
I'll concede you the point about Yonkers,
The same, however, CANNOT be said about the first big epic push back eastward after the President-in-Exile's stirring speech about why Humanity has a duty and responsibility to do more than secure Fiddler's Green-type enclaves, and actually clear the "White Zones". Soldiers trained to fire in a synchronized manner with a metronome as the actual training aid....resulting in piling terminated zombie corpses "....Over twice the height of the tallest trooper..." I mean c'mon, they had to use heavy earth-moving machinery to push holes in the "Corpse box" so the soldiers could get out when the battle ended.
How do you HIDE THAT? Hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands...maybe even a full hundred thousand rotting bodies that have all been struck in the skull by (at best) the 5.56x45mm round of the M-16. Zombies clambering atop these walls of bodies, only to be headshot in the process and becoming another brick in the wall-of-rotting-flesh.
I also reiterate....the South African Plan was the cornerstone used by the majority of European countries and a large handful of Asian territories to evacuate large numbers of people, and buy themselves time to establish strongholds to house those evacuees that were capable of withstanding 50-100k zombies throwing themselves at their perimeters. You can't gloss over the horrifying, soul-numbingly revolting Devil's Deal the First World nations made to continue existing. Doing so would rob much of the impact from the narrative. That's not about being a gore-hound...that's pointing out that the "strong story" is lynch-pinned by an atrocity that rivals The Holocaust.
And Hellsing, if you think the assault on the celebrity stronghold by the disenfranchised survivors even makes the Top Five list of Most Violent Stories/Interviews in WWZ, you really need to go back and read the book more carefully. Some of the smaller, "minor" accounts are chock full of gruesome violence....the marathon/running-fanatic's account of the dozens of survivors that started out...with every mile or so someone lost the will to keep up the pace and was quickly dragged down....the desperation that set in as the group shrank, shrank and shrank some more. What kind of meaning would a visual version of his story have if we don't see the ultimate price paid by those who failed to flog their exhausted bodies into continuing to run?
The most likely way this would go down if they were committed to a PG-13 is A) The removal and/or EXTREME editing (to the point of making the stories from WWZ different stories entirely. Ones with only a vague similarity to the original subject matter from which they were "adapted"....or B) The near-constant use of visual cop-outs...such as just as the zombies latch onto someone the camera pans away and you just hear the screams trail off into nasty wet sounds...or the beaten-to-death visual device of showing what amounts to a shadow-play of the events by showing you the moving shadows being cast by victim and attackers...or a sudden environmental obstruction blocking 85% of the scene where the zombie attack is taking place.
If we were simply talking about your classic, run of the mill "Survivors realize the undead have risen to attack the living. Survivors either A) Find somewhere to hole up and defend/secure until help comes (which never does)...or B) Survivors continue their Mad-Maxish nomadic travels across an infested nation....then yes, judicious use of some of these visual cop-outs in tasteful ways...paired with strong characterization, excellent plot/plot pacing....and a scenario that doesn't stretch suspension of disbelief too far would work.
Unfortunately, WWZ isn't that. Most of the accounts/interviews it contains are full of mature themes. Deeply critical subtext concerning how governments cover their ass even at the expense of huge portions of their citizenry....Detailed indictments of human nature, and how we humans strongly tend to sink into the depths of depravity when the alternative is death. (Ie: The South African Plan never could've been exported to the majority of European nations if the hundreds of thousands of people deemed "worthy" of evacuation didn't tacitly consent to the slaughter of tens/hundreds of thousands by zombies in order to secure their safety....even what will undoubtedly be taken by some religious fundamentalists as a slap in the face to their beliefs (the account of the woman who sees the souls of the people still trapped as helpless spectators to the horrible acts being committed by their undead bodies.)
All of these are by definition Mature Themes. Yes, there are some accounts that fall within PG-13 limits, such as the astronaut's and a few of the medical explorations of the nature of the zombie contagion...but the real highlights....the juicy stuff that really drives home the horror of the work....it can be done in PG-13...just not well.
I'm open to differing opinions...I'd just like to hear a somewhat in-depth explanation as to why you believe these mature themes can be well-made within PG-13 limits...and how they might actually go about accomplishing that feat, because honestly....I just can't see it.
|
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
While there are a few bloody scenes, they're not all that extensive imo. 
Bookmarks