UNDER THE BED - NOW ONLINE (Wash DC 48hfp)

[DjfunkmasterG]

http://www.firstsessionmovie.com/utb/high.asp Check it out. This is the film I worked on the weekend of May 5th & 6th 2006 in Woodbridge Virgina. This will also be playing at the AFI in Silver Spring Maryland Thursday May 11th 2006.

[axlish]

That was good. There were a couple of good scares and I had a smile on my face the whole time. When the time passes I laughed my ass off at the girl's expression Great effort!

[DjfunkmasterG]

I busted a gut too. However, i don't think that was the intention. I am gonna feel bad sitting with me team and laughing my ass tomorrow when i see that scene again. Ya know for a film that was shot 90% handheld it looked pretty good. Believe me when i say Handheld was not the choice. We used my DVX100 and during the filming of the rape scene the piece at the bottom of the camera whene you mount the tripod broke while on the steadicam, hence making the remainder of the film being shot handheld. We had a major audio problem as well so all the audio is the on camera mic except for 1 minute of footage. Because of all the lights and wires the boom mic was picking up every bit of electrical hum you could imagine. Hence why you get the bathroom echo.

[Adrenochrome]

I really enjoyed that. I love how she crawled on top of the night-stand to reach the fire extinguisher. The end title music is perfect! I'm sending that link to my "movie group" buddies. They'll love it! peace, Tom

[MinionZombie]

That was very cool indeed, a nice little script and well put together, especially considering the time constraints. It was quite tense as well, which is a real achievement in such a short space of time, the girl trying not to touch the floor around the bed reminds me so much of when I was a little kid scared of monsters under the bed ... or when you'd be having fun playing lava floor or something. Very cool little film, well done to all involved! Good luck in the competition.

[Adrenochrome]

the girl trying not to touch the floor around the bed reminds me so much of when I was a little kid scared of monsters under the bed ... or when you'd be having fun playing lava floor or something. Ya, the scene I mentioned reminded me of when I was a kid; always wondering if anything was "down there"....I'd wake up in the middle of the night and imagine all kinds of horrific wonders! Those are the memories that made me a horror fan. It's nice to see someone else's version!

[DjfunkmasterG]

There is some great little jump scares. I wouldn't mind seeing a much longer version being done, beefing up the plot a bit more etc etc. I will let you guys know tonight via this post how we faired in the competition. I doubt we will win best picture, but I hope the editing gets some kudo's or at least the cinematography.

[MinionZombie]

I remember as a kid hiding behind the sofa at Doctor Who, I'd heard the announcer say it before the show and when I was that young I thought it was what you were supposed to do, as if it was a national solution to being scared by Doctor Who, honestly, lol. Nowadays the show just gives me the willies now and then (gas mask zombies for instance), or it gets me all misty-eyed, like last week's episode. Awww, poor Doctor... Yes I've gone all sappy...I'm not the hard-nosed grunter I used to be...okay that's bollocks but I'm still a sappy sod, lol.

[axlish]

Out of curiosuity, why did you opt for 4:3 in stead of 16:9?

[MinionZombie]

That was in 16:9 ... well, okay it seemed to be filmed in 4:3 but then widescreen was 'faked'. Not sure how they did it, but I do something similar I imagine. I have a couple of all-black JPEGs and I place them over the image at the right points. I thought maybe that's what they did cos you could see a tiny sliver of the image above the top bar.

[DjfunkmasterG]

Out of curiosuity, why did you opt for 4:3 in stead of 16:9? The Panasonic DVX100 doesn't have a true 16:9 mode it has a 4:3 letterbox 16:9. it is the only Mini DV camera under $4,000 USD that can record in 24P mode, but it does it in 4:3 letterbox. The Canon XL2 is the next camera that is native 16:9. I didn't choose the 4:3 setting the DP chose that and the editor made the 16:9 black bars. Being the First Asst to the DP you learn a few things, like lighting and stuff, and when to use 4:3. He (the DP) needed it so he could see the whole scene through the LCD viewer, but on the playback deck the correct 16:9 bars were showing. I don't understand why the bars look so funky though. Here is a tidbit for you.... For $800 USD you can by a 16:9 adapter lens to fit the DVX100. The problem is... it's $800USD

[MinionZombie]

Have you ever used a Canon XM2? Just interested in what you think of it if you have used one at some point.

[DjfunkmasterG]

My DP has used it I think. isn't that the PAL version of the GL2? If it is I used a GL1 on Most of DEADLANDS until I got the DVX100. Well, The final outcome. We had the best Audience reaction of all 12 films that showed. All the jump scares got some people jumping and a few screams from the girls. I don't know if we will win best picture, but I hope we win one of the categories and I think we have a real shot. The director and his wife were handing out Promo material to people going in the theater, in fact i think they were the only ones handing out Promo material which was very cool. I also found out there will be no extended cut put on the web, so I am sorry for getting your hopes up. it was discussed, but I guess the director decided against it.

[MinionZombie]

Well I certainly hope you guys win one of the categories for that film because it deserves it, to get an audience jumping and wrapped up in proceedings within 4 to 7 minutes is a great achievement with 48 hours work. Yeh the Canon XM2 is PAL, it's the cameras they have at the Rural Media Company, so I've been getting a lot of use out of them what with getting experience there for the past few months now. There's better cameras out there, but I feel it's a pretty good camera...perhaps not worth the £1500 it costs just about everywhere I look, but decent all the same, especially for putting together some indie films.

[DjfunkmasterG]

Well I certainly hope you guys win one of the categories for that film because it deserves it, to get an audience jumping and wrapped up in proceedings within 4 to 7 minutes is a great achievement with 48 hours work. Yeh the Canon XM2 is PAL, it's the cameras they have at the Rural Media Company, so I've been getting a lot of use out of them what with getting experience there for the past few months now. There's better cameras out there, but I feel it's a pretty good camera...perhaps not worth the £1500 it costs just about everywhere I look, but decent all the same, especially for putting together some indie films. This is your Camera correct? That is the Canon XM2, it is known in the USA as the GL2 and they are nice, native 16:9 1/4" CCD cameras, but Canon stopped making them. I hear a lot of complaints on DVINFO.NET about broken drives and tape carriers, ro the camera just stops working altogether. My original camera was just like that though. I had the previous model the GL1, or as you know it the XM1. Great camera, worked like a horse, but it hated big differences in temperatures. A small shift of even 20 degrees made the camera operate funny. This is my camera. That is the Original Panasonic DVX100 I have version P just like in the picture. This camera is very cool and records 24P which is film speed here in the USA. This camera retails for around $3,000 - $4,000 depending where you buy it and it has tons of great features on it. If you're going to keep doing films Minion.... I suggest you check one of these out or at least a Canon XL2.