Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: The Great Orator

  1. #1
    Twitching thxleo's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    857
    United States

  2. #2
    Feeding ProfessorChaos's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    where eagles dare
    Posts
    3,501
    United States
    i'm pretty sure those fingers towards the eyes which he was trying to depict as a "breathalyzer/inhaler" is actually code for "quick, fix my fucking teleprompter!!!"

  3. #3
    Twitching thxleo's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    857
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by ProfessorChaos View Post
    i'm pretty sure those fingers towards the eyes which he was trying to depict as a "breathalyzer/inhaler" is actually code for "quick, fix my fucking teleprompter!!!"
    I think you might be right about that.

  4. #4
    Ipsissimus Kaos's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    friggin' Baltimore
    Posts
    1,977
    Germany
    Showing a gaffe or two does not make him a poor orator. Considering the number of flawless speeches I have seen, makes the attempt to use this video as evidence of anything a huge joke. Nothing will compare to the inability for Bush to speak in public. I don't hate Bush at all. I would get embarrassed for him to the extent that I would get a pit in my stomach every time he opened his mouth. He had the worst luck and the least talent in public speaking in modern presidential history. But if the conservatives are floating this video around as a statement of some kind, such as implying that Barack Obama can't consistantly deliver a good and sometimes great speech, then they really need to go back to school about what being a good orator means.

  5. #5
    Twitching strayrider's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    699
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaos View Post
    Showing a gaffe or two does not make him a poor orator. Considering the number of flawless speeches I have seen, makes the attempt to use this video as evidence of anything a huge joke. Nothing will compare to the inability for Bush to speak in public. I don't hate Bush at all. I would get embarrassed for him to the extent that I would get a pit in my stomach every time he opened his mouth. He had the worst luck and the least talent in public speaking in modern presidential history. But if the conservatives are floating this video around as a statement of some kind, such as implying that Barack Obama can't consistantly deliver a good and sometimes great speech, then they really need to go back to school about what being a good orator means.
    True. Bush couldn't give a decent speech even with a tele-prompter. Obama is much more "slick" when it come to "talkin' purty".

    I don't believe that either of these men are as dumb, or as brilliant, as their opposing sides make them out to be. They're both good men, likable enough as people if you put your bias aside, and they're both human which makes them inherently flawed.

    Politically, though, I don't agree with either one of them.

    Where is Teddy Roosevelt when we really need him?



    -stray-

  6. #6
    Feeding Tricky's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,639
    England
    The main thing that people seem to fail to grasp,is that good speeches dont make a good leader!tony blair made endless "great speeches" but he was absolutely cack as a prime minister & never followed up any of his promises that he made in his speeches,actions speak far louder than words

  7. #7
    Team Rick MinionZombie's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Mandatorium
    Posts
    24,193
    UK
    Quote Originally Posted by Tricky View Post
    The main thing that people seem to fail to grasp,is that good speeches dont make a good leader!tony blair made endless "great speeches" but he was absolutely cack as a prime minister & never followed up any of his promises that he made in his speeches,actions speak far louder than words
    Nor do rubbish orators make good leaders though...




    Sorry ... couldn't resist ... it was pretty much the political talking gaffe of 2008 over here.

    Now a bit of analysis of said gaffe from Sky News:



    I'm sure Liam will hit back with some Cameron gaffe just to spite me or something, hehe.

    But back to Brown - the man can't stand up and make a good speach. It's always clunky - he doesn't do self-deprecation - jokes are prepared and delivered in a stale, laborious fashion - he trots out the same old tired lines week-after-week-after-week in PMQ's (while ignored the point of PMQs - which is for the PM to answer questions, which aren't planted). The man can't even control a smile - when and where to use them, how to form one even.

    Numerous times I've seen him at press briefings, or on PMQs, and he's smiling at the most inopportune moments, or when serious matters are being discussed - this past week he was grinning like an idiot at Cameron's PMQs on the sorry state of the economy - he'd be grinning about Cameron no doubt, but it's the juxtaposition of the smiling and the topic being discussed - just no Gordon ... no.

    Blair was a much better speaker - but even he lost it towards the end - Blair's bloated pauses got beyond ridiculous that it took about eleven years for him to get a few sentences out, it was unbearable.

    Mind you, when Blair was recently on The Daily Show, I thought he did quite well ... I wonder how many of the audience members had thought he was still the UK PM? That's not a diss, I'm genuinely wondering, as I remember a while back when Brown went to the USA at the same time as the Pope, they did vox pops and barely anyone had heard of Brown, let alone knew who he was - but they all knew the Pope of course - mind you, that's not exactly a level playing field, but still.

    Anyway - gaffes are bound to happen, or there are going to be times when you're not on top of your game - but in response to that, it comes down to how you deal with the gaffe, or the troubled delivery.

    They may be politicians, but they're still people, and standing up in front of not only a big crowd - but everyone watching on TV - is a scary-ass thing, and it's bound to get the better of even the best orators at some point. But equally, as a politician, you've got to get on with that (it's part of the job).

    I don't mind teleprompters so much - just as long as you don't rely on it like it was your lifeblood, that if something does go wrong you most likely can fanagle your way around it, or shrug it off - not that I expect people to memorise whole speaches multiple times a week - I know I couldn't - not even the best actors could, nevermind a politician.

    Anyway - thought I'd share that recent gaffe from the UK PM as we discuss America's new President, in relation to gaffes.

    ...

    As for the video posted originally, specifically - he does flub quite a bit, and grounds to a halt almost - but - he does shrug it off, calls attention to it, and goes about excusing himself.

    If he'd just barged on desperately without calling attention to it, then that would have been cringe-worthy, but instead it doesn't really play out that way in the video.
    Last edited by MinionZombie; 27-Jan-2009 at 10:15 AM.

  8. #8
    Ipsissimus Kaos's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    friggin' Baltimore
    Posts
    1,977
    Germany
    Quote Originally Posted by Tricky View Post
    The main thing that people seem to fail to grasp,is that good speeches dont make a good leader!tony blair made endless "great speeches" but he was absolutely cack as a prime minister & never followed up any of his promises that he made in his speeches,actions speak far louder than words
    No one here is failing to grasp anything, Trick. This is a discussion about speeches, not governance.

  9. #9
    Arcade Master Philly_SWAT's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Daytona Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,000
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Tricky View Post
    The main thing that people seem to fail to grasp,is that good speeches dont make a good leader!tony blair made endless "great speeches" but he was absolutely cack as a prime minister & never followed up any of his promises that he made in his speeches,actions speak far louder than words
    This is a thing that people fail to grasp, but I dont think it is the main thing. The main thing people fail to grasp in my opinion is that exceptional speaking skills, or lack thereof, has no bearing at all upon intelligence and/or ability to make good decisions. Sometimes they coincide, sometimes they dont.

    Saying "Obama is a good speaker" in and of itself does not give an indication that he is smart or has good decision making abilities. At the same time, saying "Obama is a good speaker" also does not fit into an argument that he isnt smart and doesnt have good decision making abilities. I have seen both arguments made, with comments along the line of "Obviously Obama is smart and can make good decisions, look at how well he speaks" and "Obviously Obama is a talented speaker, BUT...(insert comment about how somehow this by definition means that he can not be smart and would make poor decisions).

    Unfortunately, most people tend to take what they personally believe and assume in any argument that they by definition are correct, then take any comment made at all, and twist it/interpret it/etc. in such a way that it supports their overall point.

    Along with this line of thinking, a person could have a 100% correct premise, but make non-logical, ill conceived supporting arguments in support of their 100% correct premise. Conversely, someone can have a premise that is seriously flawed, but they make brilliant, well conceived logical points in favor of it. The problem I have seen in many online discussions (as well as discussions irl) is that people fail to understand this. Discussions about an overall point devolve into discussions about supporting arguments, supporting arguments that people refuse to yield on even when they are obviously wrong, because they fear that by admitting defeat on a supporting argument, they are somehow admitting defeat on their overall argument which may in fact be 100% correct. It is humorous to me to see these types of arguments, and frustrating at the same time.

  10. #10
    has the velocity Mike70's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,543
    Canada
    obama certainly might not be marcus cicero or demosthenes when it comes to public speaking but he is far cry from the gaffe a minute, "can-you-actually-speak-english" antics of bush. i doubt if lysias himself could've helped out bush.
    "The bumps you feel are asteroids smashing into the hull."

  11. #11
    Dying DawnGirl27's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    North Dakota
    Posts
    367
    United States
    It didn't really help to have the guy giving Obama the lines to repeat flub up and throw him off, either...

  12. #12
    Team Rick MinionZombie's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Mandatorium
    Posts
    24,193
    UK
    Quote Originally Posted by DawnGirl27 View Post
    It didn't really help to have the guy giving Obama the lines to repeat flub up and throw him off, either...
    Indeed.

    ...

    Although did anyone see Bush's speach once he'd returned to Texas? He actually did a good speach - probably one of his best ever speaches (and I'm being sincere here) ... I mean, it wasn't weighty or whatever, but it was entertaining and consistent and not full of Bush-isms.

    Anyway, just thought it was interesting - also interesting that the news networks here in the UK quickly grew tired of it and just had their anchors talk all over it in a pop up window (so then why show a video feed of Bush talking if we can't hear him?), and then they just ditched it completely - not even a box in the red button interactive bit on Sky News.

    ...

    And speaking of Sky News ... or is it BBC ... whichever, they're almost identical really - this "Obama: Day 7" stuff is stupid - are we going to have "Obama: Day 786" or what? It's just silly.

    Have Inauguration Day ... then sum up his first month, then his first year, then his first term - don't be treating every day with it's own damn title.

    Bloody Sky News/BBC News ... bunch of nobs most of the time anyway...

  13. #13
    pissing in your Kool-Aid DjfunkmasterG's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Deadlands, USA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    7,663
    United States
    They did it with Bush...


    Day 7, they usually cover the first week, then you get bits here and there until they summarize the first 100, after that you won't hear a peep until the 6 month to 1 year mark, unless some major disaster strikes.
    ALWAYS BET ON DEAD!
    Official member of the "ZOMBIE MAN" Fan Club Est. 2007 *FOUNDING MEMBER*

  14. #14
    Walking Dead SRP76's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,826
    United States
    They're all just trained reciters, anyway. So who cares?

    Take away the teleprompters, pre-written speeches (that someone else writes for them anyway), and make them address the public freestyle, speaking solely from their own knowledge. I'll bet that 99% would look like an extra from Diary in that situation. Even worse, if there is a Q&A session involved.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Banned User

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,219
    United States
    Sad but true, for most people (non-politicians) as well, I'm sure. God knows I'm no mean oralist, but I do love the English language. It helps me to communicate, don'tchaknow?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •