Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: Human Centipede II banned in the UK

  1. #1
    Webmaster Neil's Avatar
    Administrator

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    nr London
    Posts
    16,308
    England

    Human Centipede II banned in the UK

    Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there--on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam. [click for more]
    -Carl Sagan

  2. #2
    Just Married AcesandEights's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mid-Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    7,479
    United States
    It's already in the can? Guess the writer didn't leave too much for polishing on this project. It's also interesting how self-referential the project seems to be.

    "Men choose as their prophets those who tell them that their hopes are true." --Lord Dunsany

  3. #3
    Team Rick MinionZombie's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Mandatorium
    Posts
    24,203
    UK
    However, Freaks, TCM, and The Exorcist were all unbanned - and don't involve sexual violence ... ... although you could argue with the crucifix thing in the latter, heh.

    By the sounds of it, it's hardly surprising - it's very rare indeed for a film to be banned outright nowadays at the BBFC. The last one I remember was "Grotesque", IIRC, some Asian torture porn movie or something, and by the sounds of it there seems to be similar reasons between the two films for the banning. Sexual violence is always a tricky area at the BBFC, and if it involves arousal then it's a big old problem for them ... and then if the victims are just objects, then you've got no hope.

    The first movie is only "meh", personally ... more shock than content or purpose. The best thing about it was the maniac Doctor, and a nice look to the film, but other than that it was pointless and pretentious ... all mouth and no trousers.

  4. #4
    Rising JDFP's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Knoxville, TN.
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,429
    United States
    I know my fellow British brothers and sisters here don't have a Constitution per se (it's more lika a verbal traditional thing if I understand it correctly, but British law confuses the piss out of me) but how does "banning" a film not break Freedom of Speech that you all supposedly have as well? Or does the British only have Freedom of Speech in so much that it's by the fiat of the government?

    Sure, we have films here in the U.S. that are 'blocked' as far as certain Americans (namely minors) are able to see, but I couldn't imagine a film actually being outright completely banned. If anything, it would cause it to be one of the most popular films of the year for that very reason because of the taboo nature of it. I'd think most Americans I know would laugh over something being classified as "banned".

    j.p.
    "Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid." - Ronald Wilson Reagan

    "A page of good prose remains invincible." - John Cheever

  5. #5
    Chasing Prey MoonSylver's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Oh
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,475
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by AcesandEights View Post
    It's already in the can? Guess the writer didn't leave too much for polishing on this project. It's also interesting how self-referential the project seems to be.
    #1------------#2--------#3
    That's what she^, and she^said?

    Quote Originally Posted by MinionZombie View Post
    all mouth and no trousers.
    Or all mouth, & mouth, & mouth & no trousers?

    Just what the world needed, The Human Centipede II. I'm sure "A Serbain Film II" won't be far behind.

    Quote Originally Posted by MoonSylver View Post
    won't be far behind.
    That's what he & she said?
    Last edited by MoonSylver; 07-Jun-2011 at 05:52 PM. Reason: meh

  6. #6
    Chasing Prey
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,125
    Canada
    reminds me of Constantine being banned in most of the middle east for giving a too accurate depiction of hell.

  7. #7
    Webmaster Neil's Avatar
    Administrator

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    nr London
    Posts
    16,308
    England
    Quote Originally Posted by acealive1 View Post
    giving a too accurate depiction of hell.
    Slight contradiction in terms IMHO...
    Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there--on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam. [click for more]
    -Carl Sagan

  8. #8
    Feeding shootemindehead's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    4,075
    Ireland
    Quote Originally Posted by JDFP View Post
    I know my fellow British brothers and sisters here don't have a Constitution per se (it's more lika a verbal traditional thing if I understand it correctly, but British law confuses the piss out of me) but how does "banning" a film not break Freedom of Speech that you all supposedly have as well? Or does the British only have Freedom of Speech in so much that it's by the fiat of the government?

    Sure, we have films here in the U.S. that are 'blocked' as far as certain Americans (namely minors) are able to see, but I couldn't imagine a film actually being outright completely banned. If anything, it would cause it to be one of the most popular films of the year for that very reason because of the taboo nature of it. I'd think most Americans I know would laugh over something being classified as "banned".

    j.p.
    There's nothing enshrined in British law about "freedom of speech" JD. Britain doesn't have the same 1st amendment building blocks that the US does and in the case of film, Britain has a long and somewhat embarrassing history of banning and cutting. No offence to the Brit lads and lassies on here.

    I'm old enough to remember the "Video Nasties" nonsense from the early 80's which led to the 1984 video recordings act and plummeted horror video into an abyss of mediocrity that has only, in the last 10 years or so, been eroded. Mainly because any movie that a viewer wants to see uncut can be purchased at a click of a button. So, banning a film has become a bit rediculous.

    The "forbidden fruit" argument that you posit is correct too. The 72 films on the UK banned list became like a checklist for horror fans and gave these (quite often awful movies) a longer life than would have been the case otherwise. I remember personally spending years trying to track down an uncut copy of 'Zombie Flesh Eaters'.

    I understand that there may be some queasiness about films like 'I spit on your grave' and 'The Beast in Heat', but some of the films that ended up being banned had no business being there, like the German/Polish arthouse movie 'Possessed', or the frankly harmless 'The Burning'.

    I recently watched a good documentary on the "video Nasty" period called 'Video Nasties: The Definitive Guide', which went into the history of this bizarre sequence of events. Very entertaining, but somewhat disturbing insight into self-appointed conservative moral makers.
    I'm runnin' this monkey farm now Frankenstein.....

  9. #9
    Chasing Prey
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,125
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil View Post
    Slight contradiction in terms IMHO...
    im just going by what i heard. lol. they only put on screen what people have always said "hell is a city"

  10. #10
    Team Rick MinionZombie's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Mandatorium
    Posts
    24,203
    UK
    However, individual councils can show a banned film if they want - the BBFC bans it from sale and distribution in the UK - like on store shelves - but councils could show it on their own if they want (and likewise individual councils can ban a film on their patch, that has been passed 18 Uncut by the BBFC for nationwide sale and distribution).

    It does indeed make it more intriguing - the banning of it - but I'm sure that doesn't change it being a pompous load of old bollocks like the first movie, only much more pompous.

  11. #11
    Fresh Meat ZombieKeeper's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Under a rock
    Posts
    22
    United States
    Watch, this will end up being nothing other than a publicity stunt :-)

  12. #12
    Team Rick MinionZombie's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Mandatorium
    Posts
    24,203
    UK
    Quote Originally Posted by ZombieKeeper View Post
    Watch, this will end up being nothing other than a publicity stunt :-)
    Erm, highly unlikely. The BBFC is an official body and they wouldn't get involved in such a stunt. However, Eureka! (the company distributing the film) are appealing the ban - not sure how far they'll get, mind you, what with all this apparent razorblade rape, sandpaper wanking, and victims who are merely objects.

  13. #13
    Chasing Prey
    Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Age
    42
    Posts
    2,705
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by MinionZombie View Post
    However, Freaks, TCM, and The Exorcist were all unbanned - and don't involve sexual violence ... ... although you could argue with the crucifix thing in the latter, heh.

    By the sounds of it, it's hardly surprising - it's very rare indeed for a film to be banned outright nowadays at the BBFC. The last one I remember was "Grotesque", IIRC, some Asian torture porn movie or something, and by the sounds of it there seems to be similar reasons between the two films for the banning. Sexual violence is always a tricky area at the BBFC, and if it involves arousal then it's a big old problem for them ... and then if the victims are just objects, then you've got no hope.

    The first movie is only "meh", personally ... more shock than content or purpose. The best thing about it was the maniac Doctor, and a nice look to the film, but other than that it was pointless and pretentious ... all mouth and no trousers.

    I agree 100% - I actually just watched Grotesque - and I can see wholeheartedly why that and the HC2 are banned. If HC2 is anything remotely like Grotesque, then they are saving your time by banning it. Grotestque started out with a shot of a couple walking into a tunnel, a guy gets out, hammers them over the head, and they wake up on in a torture chamber. From there its 90 minutes of ridiculous sexual and physical torture with absolutely NO narrative or point to it whatsoever. They banned it because it was "torture for its own sake". I agree - if there's no reason to understand what's happening, no rationale, no narrative, then there's no point. It didn't tell a story, in the same way a pron video won't tell a story. It just starts, then it ends.

    There was a flash of genius in the middle of the movie, but just a tiny, tiny flash. It provides the viewer with about 2% of the detail it needs to actually be considered even a shitty low budget horror movie. It's not - its just Gorn, as it's come to be known.

    As for the HC2, I imagine it's just the same as that - a guy kidnaps a bunch of people, and we just watch them feeding off the other's shit for 2 hours. I never used to agree with BBFC bannings - but you know what, in these two cases I do. Not so much because of the risk to minors, although that's a factor, it's just saving people's time, effort, and money investing in such a terrible, pointless escapade into violence.

    Now if you look back on banned movies - by and large most of them are turgid shite. The Excorcist, as much as I despise that movie, at least was intelligent, thought provoking, intense....gimmie that over Nekromatic any day. To my knowledge that really was the only intelligent movie to be banned (The Excorcist), A Clockwork Orange WASN'T banned (it just wasn't released by Kubrick). Oh Texas Chainsaw was amazing, and banned...forgot about that one...I think as soon as the BBFC started to look at the bigger picture ie: the narrative constructed around a violent movie, that they really started being a lot more rational about their censorship.

    -- -------- Post added at 08:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:51 AM ----------

    But then there was the controversial A Serbian Film - which to be honest I had on a memory stick not two weeks ago - but I deleted it because to be perfectly frank, I couldn't bring myself to watch that movie. Although I'm told there is a strong narrative reason for what happens in that movie - I just don't want to see it. I won't go into details, for the sake of this boards innocence - it's got a truly fucking sick pay off to the whole thing.
    Innocent victims of merciless crimes, fall prey to some madman's impulsive designs.

    Step after step we try controlling our fate. When we finally start living, it's become too late.

  14. #14
    Team Rick MinionZombie's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Mandatorium
    Posts
    24,203
    UK
    Quote Originally Posted by SymphonicX View Post
    I agree 100% - I actually just watched Grotesque - and I can see wholeheartedly why that and the HC2 are banned. If HC2 is anything remotely like Grotesque, then they are saving your time by banning it. Grotestque started out with a shot of a couple walking into a tunnel, a guy gets out, hammers them over the head, and they wake up on in a torture chamber. From there its 90 minutes of ridiculous sexual and physical torture with absolutely NO narrative or point to it whatsoever. They banned it because it was "torture for its own sake". I agree - if there's no reason to understand what's happening, no rationale, no narrative, then there's no point. It didn't tell a story, in the same way a pron video won't tell a story. It just starts, then it ends.

    There was a flash of genius in the middle of the movie, but just a tiny, tiny flash. It provides the viewer with about 2% of the detail it needs to actually be considered even a shitty low budget horror movie. It's not - its just Gorn, as it's come to be known.

    As for the HC2, I imagine it's just the same as that - a guy kidnaps a bunch of people, and we just watch them feeding off the other's shit for 2 hours. I never used to agree with BBFC bannings - but you know what, in these two cases I do. Not so much because of the risk to minors, although that's a factor, it's just saving people's time, effort, and money investing in such a terrible, pointless escapade into violence.

    Now if you look back on banned movies - by and large most of them are turgid shite. The Excorcist, as much as I despise that movie, at least was intelligent, thought provoking, intense....gimmie that over Nekromatic any day. To my knowledge that really was the only intelligent movie to be banned (The Excorcist), A Clockwork Orange WASN'T banned (it just wasn't released by Kubrick). Oh Texas Chainsaw was amazing, and banned...forgot about that one...I think as soon as the BBFC started to look at the bigger picture ie: the narrative constructed around a violent movie, that they really started being a lot more rational about their censorship.

    -- -------- Post added at 08:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:51 AM ----------

    But then there was the controversial A Serbian Film - which to be honest I had on a memory stick not two weeks ago - but I deleted it because to be perfectly frank, I couldn't bring myself to watch that movie. Although I'm told there is a strong narrative reason for what happens in that movie - I just don't want to see it. I won't go into details, for the sake of this boards innocence - it's got a truly fucking sick pay off to the whole thing.
    Indeed - there are still some out there who believe the BBFC is some dictatorship, but since 1999 they've become something entirely different to what they were during the 1980s - which was a ridiculous time for horror movies, and not just because of the BBFC, but because of legislation, MPs (from all sides of the house with hardly, if any, dissenting voices supporting the banned flicks), and a moral panic instigated by tabloid papers looking to flog some dead trees ... ... we've come a long way since then. Bans are extremely rare these days, and censorship is extremely rare too - oftentimes it's usually at the behest of the distributors and for something minor (e.g. 2 seconds from The Expendables for one knife stab to get a 15 rather than an 18 ... or a couple of re-framed photos from The Hangover 2's end credits to get a 15 and not an 18), but the BBFC themselves have their heads screwed on.

    Now, the debate continues about whether or not a pointless load of old violence (such as Grotesque, as you mentioned), should be allowed in for people to make up their own minds - that's a whole other thing I'm not interested in getting into, but judging from the description and reasoning behind the ban, I'm hardly surprised they did. There was miniscule characterisation in the first Human Centipede as it was (and they weren't particularly likeable characters either), so if the second has sod all, and goes running into the world of sexual violence, then I'm hardly surprised.

    Interestingly, with that 'Extreme Porn' legislation that Labour barged through when they were still in government, some have pondered whether if you'd be liable for a spanking by the law for possessing THC2 ... but then considering it's primary purpose isn't for sexual arousal, you'd probably be alright ... although what the primary purpose of THC2 is, I really don't know.

    Interesting that you mention A Serbian Film - I too have no interest in seeing that movie. The first time I read the description of the film, including what was cut by the BBFC, I genuinely felt depressed afterwards ... I felt dirty just reading the description. Then seeing relatively modest pictoral representations of the cuts on Movie Censorship further compounding my lack of want in seeing this flick. I don't see how gross sexual violence (sometimes involving children) translates to a biting critique of Serbian politics - and it certainly doesn't bring the debate around to such things, because the debate only ends up being about the sexual violence within the film. A documentary directly about the horrors of Serbia's past and present would have actually gotten the media talking about the important issue.

    I remember when I was a teenager, my idea to become a filmmaker was "make the most disgusting film ever and ride the controversy" - but it was just that, the moronic half-baked insta-thought of a teenager ... however, it seems some filmmakers much older (and surely, by default even, wiser) still possess such a train of thought.

  15. #15
    Desiderata Satanicus Andy's Avatar
    Administrator

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,532
    England
    Lets be honest MZ, anyone who gets turned on watching the human centipede 2 probably does need punishing

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •