PDA

View Full Version : Milk in Milk Chocolate? Whatever Next!


Andy
13-Jan-2009, 12:17 PM
http://news.uk.msn.com/odd-news/article.aspx?cp-documentid=12699030

Seriously people that stupid probably wont read the warning anyway. :lol:
darth los
13-Jan-2009, 06:11 PM
Brought to you by the people who brought you the instructions on the back of the shampoo bottle!!! :hyper:


Seriously, it just seems to me that there are some things that fall in the catagory of common knowledge/sense. And people, this is one of those things.





:cool:
capncnut
13-Jan-2009, 06:17 PM
But Cadbury says it is also necessary to print warnings in capital letters in yellow boxes saying "CONTAINS: MILK" in case people who are allergic to milk do not realise that there is milk in Cadbury Dairy Milk bars.
LOL, what's next? Curry menu's with warnings that read "CONTAINS: CURRY". :lol:
Tricky
13-Jan-2009, 06:22 PM
it said in the paper yesterday that brussels/the EU had something to do with this

musnt........start....fourth reich...rant :mad:
darth los
13-Jan-2009, 06:37 PM
LOL, what's next? Curry menu's with warnings that read "CONTAINS: CURRY". :lol:

It's the most ridiculous things that you can think of that end up coming true. Whodda thunk that there would have to be a warning on the sides of coffee cups saying that the contents are hot? :confused:




:cool:
capncnut
13-Jan-2009, 07:02 PM
http://www.monproductions.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/colonel/_nuts.jpg

:lol:
blind2d
14-Jan-2009, 04:20 AM
Yep... what'd I tell ya? Things are getting bad...
Mike70
14-Jan-2009, 04:28 AM
these sorts of labels are for the geniuses that can't figure out that coffee is served hot.
MoonSylver
14-Jan-2009, 06:08 AM
these sorts of labels are for the geniuses that can't figure out that coffee is served hot.

What?!? They put warning labels on coffee??? Damn!!! There goes my lawsuit to make millions....:D
Andy
14-Jan-2009, 02:28 PM
I actually work retail security, and in the store i work, in the bakery the garlic bread has on the label WARNING: MAY CONTAIN GARLIC. work that one out.

Now the really concerning part of that is that is may contain garlic, in other words, it may not..
Yojimbo
14-Jan-2009, 08:38 PM
What?!? They put warning labels on coffee??? Damn!!! There goes my lawsuit to make millions....:D
Exactly why this warning appears now! Did not this come about because some woman burned herself with coffee from a McDonalds drivethrough?

But had to laugh at the photo of the bag of nuts that has the warning "May Contain Nuts"
Mike70
14-Jan-2009, 08:59 PM
i think another classic example of these sorts of signs are when you go to a fish and chips joint and big as life there will be a sign that says "Warning: fish and shellfish are prepared at this location."

i mean who would've ever thought that fish&shellfish would be prepared at a fish and chips shop?
Eyebiter
14-Jan-2009, 10:12 PM
It should read 'Chocolate from China causes Kidney Damage'
CornishCorpse
15-Jan-2009, 01:59 AM
:| Ah how far we have come
DjfunkmasterG
15-Jan-2009, 04:07 PM
STUPIDITY AT ITS FINEST.


LMAO, this made my day. The world is now pussified to the utmost extreme.
darth los
15-Jan-2009, 04:21 PM
STUPIDITY AT ITS FINEST.


LMAO, this made my day. The world is now pussified to the utmost extreme.


Of course it is. I often wonder how the people of today would get along a hundred years ago when you really had to be a man/woman to survive. No welfare, no fast food and no my space. They'd be crying for their cell phones and internet in about 10 minutes. :(





:cool:
DjfunkmasterG
15-Jan-2009, 06:15 PM
I would cry for my internet. Fuck the cell phone.
Mike70
15-Jan-2009, 07:02 PM
Of course it is. I often wonder how the people of today would get along a hundred years ago when you really had to be a man/woman to survive. No welfare, no fast food and no my space. They'd be crying for their cell phones and internet in about 10 minutes.

a world without internet porn?

kill me now.
blind2d
16-Jan-2009, 02:52 AM
I would miss air conditioning... but, sorry guys, I could be just fine without you. No disrespect.
DubiousComforts
16-Jan-2009, 04:50 AM
Exactly why this warning appears now! Did not this come about because some woman burned herself with coffee from a McDonalds drive through?
Oh Lordy... The McDonalds lawsuit was not about some woman burning herself with coffee, which so obviously is intended to be served hot. Rather, it was about a corporation being held liable for a blatantly disgusting and unsafe business practice in, of all things, the food service industry.

While it has been recognized as "the single most misunderstood case in the history of US jurisprudence," I suspect the very reason for this continued insanity with disclaimers is due to the self-righteous, simple-minded fist-pounding insistence that the McDonalds case was simply about an elderly consumer spilling coffee on her vagina.

Yesterday, I saw a commercial for a law office, which I was dutifully informed was being announced by a "non-attorney spokesperson." God Bless America.