EvilNed
08-Feb-2009, 10:01 AM
Found this on IMDb. It's interesting how almost all characters in the list are of characters that are directly related to the morals of some old-fashioned geezer sitting around in a rocking chair on a southern porch, and stroking his rifle. In other words, Character number 7 obviously wrote this article.
Yes, the guy has a few points. But that's not even remotely interesting (because few of them are good points anyway) compared to what kind of guy must have written this.
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/01/20/10-cliches-that-must-die/
The guy, first and foremost, seems to take films way to literally... He's the kind of guy who wants film to be true to HIS morals, so that the kids will learn something decent, and not that crap that's on TV today... You know the kind.
And second, I'm amused by this part: "Based on what evidence?"
The writer spews forth this line, meanwhile I've been reading the entire article thinking the exact same thing. Ironic.
Yes, the guy has a few points. But that's not even remotely interesting (because few of them are good points anyway) compared to what kind of guy must have written this.
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/01/20/10-cliches-that-must-die/
The guy, first and foremost, seems to take films way to literally... He's the kind of guy who wants film to be true to HIS morals, so that the kids will learn something decent, and not that crap that's on TV today... You know the kind.
And second, I'm amused by this part: "Based on what evidence?"
The writer spews forth this line, meanwhile I've been reading the entire article thinking the exact same thing. Ironic.