Hancock 2

[Neil]

Seems like I'm one of the few people who actually enjoyed the original...

Sure it had flaws but I still enjoyed it. Hopefully a sequel can improve on it...

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Hancock-2-Actually-Happening-But-Maybe-It-ll-Be-Better-14500.html

[MinionZombie]

Ugh ... the first was forgettable, watered down pish, which had moments of interest.

I wanted the full-on R-Rated Hancock, but oh no, can't have Will Smith doing that ... let's just make a lame movie with a twist you see coming from a bajillion miles away. :rolleyes:

Got no interest in seeing it again, let alone a sequel.

[EvilNed]

I kinda liked it. But I do remember thinking the "villain" was kinda forced into it somehow. He had no real reason to hate Hancock.

[Neil]

Yeh... All valid grievances... But I still enjoyed it :)

[AcesandEights]

Aw, hell no!

(I haven't even seen the first one yet and don't really care to.)

[Danny]

i really liked hancock, but does the story need a sequel?, not really, it ended with him finally settling into the role of a hero, what more did you need to see?, hes the only superhero and theres no supervillians, it can only be two things, one: its more of the same, two: a "previous unknown" superpowered villain shows up.

if something besides those two are the outcome ill eat my hat with a bagel and cream cheese.

[blind2d]

Mmmm.... bagel... But seriously, I'm sick and tired of sequels! Originality, people! It's out there, I know it!

[bassman]

I recall thinking Hancock was "okay", but now I can't remember very much of it. That says alot, right there...

I'm all for sequels if there's a story to tell, but this?:confused:

[MinionZombie]

I recall thinking Hancock was "okay", but now I can't remember very much of it. That says alot, right there...

I'm all for sequels if there's a story to tell, but this?:confused:
Sequels are better than a whole line of remakes though.

I'd rather have a pointless sequel than a pointless remake.

[clanglee]

I dunno. . I really liked Hancock. It explored a different side of the superhero persona. . one that we havn't seen on screen at least. I think there's still plenty left to do with the story, although I would prefer a prequel. . .showing his downward spiral.

[Spider Rico]

The previews led you to believe the movie was going to blow you away. In instead I was given this major snoozefest. I'll pass on part II should it come out.

[MoonSylver]

I dunno. . I really liked Hancock. It explored a different side of the superhero persona. . one that we havn't seen on screen at least.

Agreed. I thought the origin was kinda interesting & how the pieces to his background/what happened to him came together.

I wouldn't mind a sequel, cause I kinda always hated when they do an "origin" story for an original superhero & then you're left thinking "I want to see what happens next!" (Unbreakable is a HUGE example to me....would have LOVED to see a sequel to that one.)

[clanglee]

(Unbreakable is a HUGE example to me....would have LOVED to see a sequel to that one.)

Oh yes indeed!!! I agree 100% Loved that movie. . and it ended feeling like it was just beginning.

[Neil]

2013? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1498780/

[LouCipherr]

Sequels are better than a whole line of remakes though.

I'd rather have a pointless sequel than a pointless remake.

This. I'm SO sick of f*cking remakes, man....

I rather enjoyed the first one, so I'd be down with a sequel if they have a decent story behind it.

"You boys sure you wanna ride this train?" <cue Sanford & Son music> :D

[MinionZombie]

Only seen Hancock once ... it was alright ... I'd have much preferred the ruder and cruder version that I've heard rumours about, which got nixed at the scripting stage.

[Neil]

Yet more talk about the sequel - http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Hancock-Sequel-Still-Possibility-28931.html