PDA

View Full Version : Nanobots killing cancer - not the future, it's now.



Kaos
25-Mar-2010, 01:29 AM
http://gizmodo.com/5501103/this-is-the-future-of-the-fight-against-cancer


This Is the Future of the Fight Against Cancer (http://gizmodo.com/5501103/this-is-the-future-of-the-fight-against-cancer)

http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_cancer-nanoparticles.jpgLook close. You may be staring at the end of cancer. Those tiny black dots are nanobots delivering a lethal blow to a cancerous cell, effectively killing it. The first trial on humans have been a success, with no side-effects:

It sneaks in, evades the immune system, delivers the siRNA, and the disassembled components exit out.
Those are the words of Mark Davis, head of the research team that created the nanobot anti-cancer army at the California Institute of Technology. According to a study to be published in Nature, Davis' team has discovered a clean, safe way to deliver RNAi sequences to cancerous cells. RNAi (Ribonucleic acid interference) is a technique that attacks specific genes in malign cells, disabling functions inside and killing them.
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_988-davis_nanoparticle_schematic_medium.jpg
The 70-nanometer attack bots—made with two polymers and a protein that attaches to the cancerous cell's surface—carry a piece of RNA called small-interfering RNA (siRNA), which deactivates the production of a protein, starving the malign cell to death. Once it has delivered its lethal blow, the nanoparticle breaks down into tiny pieces that get eliminated by the body in the urine.
The most amazing thing is that you can send as many of these soldiers as you want, and they will keep attaching to the bad guys, killing them left, right, and center, and stopping tumors. According to Davis, "the more [they] put in, the more ends up where they are supposed to be, in tumour cells." While they will have to finish the trials to make sure that there are no side-effects whatsoever, the team is very happy with the successful results and it's excited about what's coming:

What's so exciting is that virtually any gene can be targeted now. Every protein now is druggable. My hope is to make tumours melt away while maintaining a high quality of life for the patients. We're moving another step closer to being able to do that now.
Hopefully, they will be right.

I had no idea they were injecting these critters into people already.

Exatreides
25-Mar-2010, 01:35 AM
Thats amazing. How long before they turn evil :p

Kaos
25-Mar-2010, 02:04 AM
I was going to label this thread as one of my "Resistance is futile..." posts, but I spared you the nerdiness of that.

slickwilly13
25-Mar-2010, 03:19 AM
I have been telling people for a long time that the cure for cancer would be achieved through nanotech. And I have been looking for some companies to invest in, so I will keeps tabs on this one.

AcesandEights
25-Mar-2010, 02:10 PM
Keep your gray goo out of my apocalyptic predictions, Nanotech!

Neil
25-Mar-2010, 03:22 PM
If this is possible, without it costing silly money, this is epic!

I didn't realise they were already doing human trials though? Last I heard it was a few years off!? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7935592.stm

Danny
25-Mar-2010, 03:36 PM
nanobots before functional sentient humanoid robots.

man, sic-fi got the order wrong.

EvilNed
25-Mar-2010, 03:38 PM
I was going to label this thread as one of my "Resistance is futile..." posts, but I spared you the nerdiness of that.

If it makes you feel better, I was thinking the same thing.

Danny
25-Mar-2010, 03:39 PM
If it makes you feel better, I was thinking the same thing.

voyager was the first series that came to mind though, im a bad man.

bassman
25-Mar-2010, 03:40 PM
It's great news that they're making some progress, but the bad news for us is that it will probably never be practical or affordable in our lifetime or our children's...

Danny
25-Mar-2010, 03:45 PM
It's great news that they're making some progress, but the bad news for us is that it will probably never be practical or affordable in our lifetime or our children's...

i doubt it dude. 2 years ago no one was using touch screen smart phones, or e readers, or considering electric cars seriously. Were making big leaps in technology faster than we notice sometimes. were just so used to the tv and the telephone we dont notice what we have in our homes is very alien to what we had way back when, but since weve grown up along side it incrementally we dont take major notice.
If theres no major side effects, if any, and its less costly than current treatments like chemo, and the costs to take care of a patient after said current treatments i can see this being put out faster than youd think, much faster.

bassman
25-Mar-2010, 03:48 PM
Aye....you have a point there. But even so, there's a big difference between touch screen phones and nanobots being widely used to cure cancer.:p

Danny
25-Mar-2010, 04:14 PM
Aye....you have a point there. But even so, there's a big difference between touch screen phones and nanobots being widely used to cure cancer.:p

true, but both were sci fi when the matrix was in cinemas at the turn of the century only a decade ago.:D

Neil
25-Mar-2010, 05:07 PM
While not painting such a 'magic bullet cure', this other article is implying it's promising!

http://www.switched.com/2010/03/25/intravenous-robots-may-be-the-key-to-cancer-fighting-rna/

general tbag
30-Mar-2010, 04:12 AM
It's great news that they're making some progress, but the bad news for us is that it will probably never be practical or affordable in our lifetime or our children's...


moores law, also wouldnt be suprising if military trials also exist,

Danny
30-Mar-2010, 05:02 AM
moores law, also wouldnt be suprising if military trials also exist,

id imagine, given stuff like the internet in the past, almost everything nowadays in a world where everyone is paranoid and scared is put into work for its military applications first before it reaches light of day for civilian applications.

MikePizzoff
30-Mar-2010, 05:30 AM
This is amazing news. I've lost many family members to cancer and just last week a close friend of mine was diagnosed with lymphoma. Any news on a possible cure for cancer is great to me.

:shifty: However, nanoBOTS... PREPARE FOR CYBERNET!!!!

Danny
30-Mar-2010, 05:41 AM
This is amazing news. I've lost many family members to cancer and just last week a close friend of mine was diagnosed with lymphoma. Any news on a possible cure for cancer is great to me.

:shifty: However, nanoBOTS... PREPARE FOR CYBERNET!!!!

Every single person in my family in recent recorded memory thats died has died of cancer, so yeah, this kind of thing does make me breath a little easier in the long run.

Neil
01-May-2014, 05:16 PM
Bringing this thread back from the dead - http://www.ibtimes.com/cancer-fighting-robot-korean-scientists-develop-nanorobots-are-more-efficient-chemotherapy-video


South Korean scientists are developing a new treatment for cancer that will be more efficient and less harmful than chemotherapy. A team at Chonnam National University has developed nanorobots that can detect and treat cancer cells in a way that avoids the harmful side-effects of modern drugs.