JDFP
20-Apr-2010, 12:11 AM
I wasn't for certain if I should post this in "horror" (the word "horror" in association with Uwe Boll means a completely different thing: i.e. 'Oh dear God the horror of watching this!') or in the media section. Please feel free to move me if I posted in the wrong place.
So, I was thinking about it, and I was wondering if Uwe Boll is intentionally attempting to be the single worst director of all time -- making Roger Corman and Ed Wood look like Bergmanesque film directors. I'm going to go out on a line (not really) in stating that "House of the Dead", "Alone in the Dark", and "Bloodrayne" are some of the worst pieces of shit ever created in the history of film. What makes them even worse is that some of these films have otherwise decent actors (Ben Kingsley, what the hell is your excuse, man?).
I just wonder if it's an agenda Boll has to make the worst films ever created. Is the man intentionally trying to usurp Ed Wood's throne? What do you think?
Anyway, I'm a little hesitant in posting this. I'm afraid that he may come on here and challenge me to a boxing match for saying such things. :)
j.p.
So, I was thinking about it, and I was wondering if Uwe Boll is intentionally attempting to be the single worst director of all time -- making Roger Corman and Ed Wood look like Bergmanesque film directors. I'm going to go out on a line (not really) in stating that "House of the Dead", "Alone in the Dark", and "Bloodrayne" are some of the worst pieces of shit ever created in the history of film. What makes them even worse is that some of these films have otherwise decent actors (Ben Kingsley, what the hell is your excuse, man?).
I just wonder if it's an agenda Boll has to make the worst films ever created. Is the man intentionally trying to usurp Ed Wood's throne? What do you think?
Anyway, I'm a little hesitant in posting this. I'm afraid that he may come on here and challenge me to a boxing match for saying such things. :)
j.p.