Against the dark

[Epidemic79]

(INFECTED,Not true Zombies!)

Didn't come across any postings on it in the search.

Anybody else seen this Steven Seagal flick yet? Yes,hes finally broken down & done a Horror movie,and for what it is,(straight-to-DVD-Bargain bin caliber)it isn't terrible. Lots of gore,great body count,fare pace. And as stated they are Not zombies,they are Infected types,as they don't actually die & then reanimate. Its clearly a "Rage virus" kind of thing. Curiously enough,in the movie they refer to them as "Vampires",yet they clearly eat human flesh-:rolleyes:

And to make it even funnier,in the end credits they are listed as...........ZOMBIES!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rW5zxbffNEg


NOTHING to rival the immortal WALKING DEAD,but its worth paying Less-than-$5-lol

[AcesandEights]

(INFECTED,Not true Zombies!)

So you're saying there was no voodoo in the film? :D

[Neil]

The reviews on IMDB kill it!

[Epidemic79]

So you're saying there was no voodoo in the film? :D

LMAO-No unfortunately there was no voodoo. And oh yeah,its a Cheepo Production all the way. Never said it rated any stars,lol.

Its total modern Seagal fare. Rushed produced,lousy audio,high school style filming,choppy editing,over done stunts,little or no common sense among the supporting characters,set in a nameless generic eastern European city. Seagal himself is only in like 8 or 10 scenes,so even he didn't really give a shit,and thats kinda sad.

But whats really pathetic is that I'd take this half ass horror flick over LAND any drunken night of the week!