LouCipherr
12-Jan-2011, 02:23 PM
Source: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=20632
Text from article:
After infringing on thousands of artists' works, the big four labels agree to collectively pay them $45M USD
Since the 1980s, record companies have taken tracks from musicians who had not signed with them and put them on a "pending list". This left thousands of musicians receiving no royalties as the major labels used, distributed, and even profited off their tracks.
In Canada alone, this situation reached the point where 300,000 tracks, some dated back to the 1980s were listed as "pending". Some musicians were actively working -- to no avail -- to stop the record companies from pirating their tracks.
Now they have a bit of vindication. After a long class action lawsuit dating back to 2008, filed on behalf of angry independent musicians, Warner Music, Sony BMG Music, EMI Music, and Universal Music have in effect acknowledged that they were engaging in copyright infringement. They have agreed to settle to the tune of $45M USD.
The Canadian Recording Industry Association CRIA, the Canadian sister organization of the RIAA, and the organization that represents the major labels claim that the payout is not an admission of guilt. They write, "The settlement is a compromise of disputed claims and is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing by the record labels."
Apparently they believe that they did not pirate tracks or commit copyright infringement because they hoped to pay artists at some point -- although they never did. In essence, their argument also boils down that it was too hard to find and legally purchase the tracks.
Unfortunately, the victory for the small artists is mostly symbolic. In Canada, the U.S., and abroad, major record labels plan to continue to sell music they've essentially pirated from "unknown artists". The lawsuit does nothing to change this situation.
Equally unfortunate is the hypocrisy of these record labels, which have perpetually worked to block the public from experiencing the same joys of piracy that's made record company executives rich and corpulent.
They've been hard at work funneling money to politicians to try to pass new international laws and treaties like ACTA, which could send peer-to-peer engine developers and those who share pirated music and movies to prison for the first time.
This irony is duly noted by the artists in the lawsuit, who write, "The conduct of the defendant record companies is aggravated by their strict and unremitting approach to the enforcement of their copyright interests against consumers."
The wife of Edwyn Collins, a major 90s British alternative star with the band Orange Juice, summed it up nicely, while describing how British record labels had stolen her husband's work and blocked him from posting it himself on online. She stated, "[We are] aware of who the biggest bootleggers are. It's not the filesharers. [A Girl Like You is sold] not by Edwyn, [but] by all sorts of respectable major labels whose licence to sell it ran out years ago and who do not account to him."
While this is a tiny, tiny step in the right direction for artists whose work has been priated by the one entity who supposedly is trying to "fight" piracy with all it's might, it's not enough. I believe this article is a prime example that file sharers are not the majority of the music industry's problem, it's the industry and it's supporters themselves that are mostly responsible for the decline.
Not only that, but these bozos agree to pay the $ for these tracks they have <ahem> "borrowed" and swore to pay back "eventually" and never did - they're going to pay the fine, but apparently continue exactly the same practice they're being fined for now. It makes me wonder why ANYONE would want to try and make it in the music business with one of the big labels supposedly "behind" them. :rolleyes:
I say fuck 'em, let them die and let the system collapse. Musicians are finding out you don't need the support of a major label anymore to make a living at music...thanks to the far-reaching hand of the internet.
Text from article:
After infringing on thousands of artists' works, the big four labels agree to collectively pay them $45M USD
Since the 1980s, record companies have taken tracks from musicians who had not signed with them and put them on a "pending list". This left thousands of musicians receiving no royalties as the major labels used, distributed, and even profited off their tracks.
In Canada alone, this situation reached the point where 300,000 tracks, some dated back to the 1980s were listed as "pending". Some musicians were actively working -- to no avail -- to stop the record companies from pirating their tracks.
Now they have a bit of vindication. After a long class action lawsuit dating back to 2008, filed on behalf of angry independent musicians, Warner Music, Sony BMG Music, EMI Music, and Universal Music have in effect acknowledged that they were engaging in copyright infringement. They have agreed to settle to the tune of $45M USD.
The Canadian Recording Industry Association CRIA, the Canadian sister organization of the RIAA, and the organization that represents the major labels claim that the payout is not an admission of guilt. They write, "The settlement is a compromise of disputed claims and is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing by the record labels."
Apparently they believe that they did not pirate tracks or commit copyright infringement because they hoped to pay artists at some point -- although they never did. In essence, their argument also boils down that it was too hard to find and legally purchase the tracks.
Unfortunately, the victory for the small artists is mostly symbolic. In Canada, the U.S., and abroad, major record labels plan to continue to sell music they've essentially pirated from "unknown artists". The lawsuit does nothing to change this situation.
Equally unfortunate is the hypocrisy of these record labels, which have perpetually worked to block the public from experiencing the same joys of piracy that's made record company executives rich and corpulent.
They've been hard at work funneling money to politicians to try to pass new international laws and treaties like ACTA, which could send peer-to-peer engine developers and those who share pirated music and movies to prison for the first time.
This irony is duly noted by the artists in the lawsuit, who write, "The conduct of the defendant record companies is aggravated by their strict and unremitting approach to the enforcement of their copyright interests against consumers."
The wife of Edwyn Collins, a major 90s British alternative star with the band Orange Juice, summed it up nicely, while describing how British record labels had stolen her husband's work and blocked him from posting it himself on online. She stated, "[We are] aware of who the biggest bootleggers are. It's not the filesharers. [A Girl Like You is sold] not by Edwyn, [but] by all sorts of respectable major labels whose licence to sell it ran out years ago and who do not account to him."
While this is a tiny, tiny step in the right direction for artists whose work has been priated by the one entity who supposedly is trying to "fight" piracy with all it's might, it's not enough. I believe this article is a prime example that file sharers are not the majority of the music industry's problem, it's the industry and it's supporters themselves that are mostly responsible for the decline.
Not only that, but these bozos agree to pay the $ for these tracks they have <ahem> "borrowed" and swore to pay back "eventually" and never did - they're going to pay the fine, but apparently continue exactly the same practice they're being fined for now. It makes me wonder why ANYONE would want to try and make it in the music business with one of the big labels supposedly "behind" them. :rolleyes:
I say fuck 'em, let them die and let the system collapse. Musicians are finding out you don't need the support of a major label anymore to make a living at music...thanks to the far-reaching hand of the internet.