BillTheButcher
12-May-2011, 12:03 PM
It's an interesting question why almost everyone seems to think living dead necessarily means zombie. Arguably, a lot of zombies aren't even necessarily living corpses at all, but merely live people infected by a virus or (as a friend's story posited) by nanobots. Also, the original Haitian zombies were very, very different from what most people think when they hear "zombie'. The mindless zombie slave of Haiti originated the term, and by that standard none of the "living dead" are zombies at all.
At the same time one can make stories about living dead which are emphatically not zombie stories. Mummy stories, for example, or Frankenstein's Monster style stories, or a story I once wrote where a man is murdered, unable to move, speak etc - in fact genuinely dead - but quite aware of what is happening to him. Is or is that not a living dead story? I had another story published on HPOTD ("Windfall") where the undead and preserved corpse of a WWII Japanese aviator killed people who came to the crash site of his bomber. I got complaints that it wasn't a zombie story, though it was filed under "Living Dead". I still maintain I am right and everyone else is wrong.
At the same time one can make stories about living dead which are emphatically not zombie stories. Mummy stories, for example, or Frankenstein's Monster style stories, or a story I once wrote where a man is murdered, unable to move, speak etc - in fact genuinely dead - but quite aware of what is happening to him. Is or is that not a living dead story? I had another story published on HPOTD ("Windfall") where the undead and preserved corpse of a WWII Japanese aviator killed people who came to the crash site of his bomber. I got complaints that it wasn't a zombie story, though it was filed under "Living Dead". I still maintain I am right and everyone else is wrong.