Nicholas Cage.... a vampire?!

[LouCipherr]

Source:
Civil War era photo eerily resembles Nicolas Cage, sparks vampire rumor (http://entertainment.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/09/20/civil-war-era-photo-eerily-resembles-nicolas-cage-sparks-vampire-rumors/#ixzz1YYwmezRn)

Some people have way too much time on their hands :lol: but you have to admit, the picture does have an eerie resemblance to Nick. :D

[bassman]

There are several similarities, but also several things that really put them apart. Still....if he were alive today he could be a good stand-in for Cage. He just needs to shave the middle of his head and wear ridiculous wigs/plugs...


http://unrealitymag.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/cage-hair.jpg

[JDFP]

I don't know about Cage being a vampire, now Charles Krauthammer on the other hand... I think IS secretly a vampire (and I've thrown this theory out there before!).

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/parkinsons/art/krauthammerp.jpg

j.p.

[LouCipherr]

Here's the pic from the website (if you haven't already looked):

http://entertainment.blogs.foxnews.com/files/2011/09/nicvampire600.jpg

The ears throw me for a loop, but the dude was (is?) almost a dead ringer for Nic Cage.


NO! NOT THE BEES! :lol: :D

[MinionZombie]

Don't suppose you heard about this on Hollywood Babble-On, did you Lou? :D

Well, that's where I heard about it from ... there's a resemblance there, but I wouldn't call ye olde dude a dead ringer for him.

That said, does anyone else think that people in general looked decidedly different back in those days than they do now ... I mean, even back to the 1920s or what have you, people looked different to how they do now ... can't explain it too well, but anyone else think that?

[AcesandEights]

there's a resemblance there, but I wouldn't call ye olde dude a dead ringer for him.

I actually think there's a hell of a resemblance, but not between the Civil war era fellow and the current era Cage (ie. not the picture they chose to use). Compare the 19th century photo to a Cage photo circa...maybe 2000 or late 90s and I think they'd look very, very close if you got a similar angle and hairstyle and a pic where Cage isn't making some cheesy melodramatic pose and expression (good luck with that).

[LouCipherr]

Don't suppose you heard about this on Hollywood Babble-On, did you Lou? :D

Funny you should mention that, but yes, I did! :lol: :D


I actually think there's a hell of a resemblance, but not between the Civil war era fellow and the current era Cage (ie. not the picture they chose to use). Compare the 19th century photo to a Cage photo circa...maybe 2000 or late 90s and I think they'd look very, very close if you got a similar angle and hairstyle and a pic where Cage isn't making some cheesy melodramatic pose and expression (good luck with that).

^ this. I agree - I think he is a striking resemblence of Cage - perhaps not the Cage of today, but like you said, late 90's early 2000 - to me (other than the ears) they look like dead ringers. :lol:

Now I'm wondering if the dude photoshopped the old civil war picture.... Hmmm...

[Mike70]

Source:
Civil War era photo eerily resembles Nicolas Cage, sparks vampire rumor (http://entertainment.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/09/20/civil-war-era-photo-eerily-resembles-nicolas-cage-sparks-vampire-rumors/#ixzz1YYwmezRn)

Some people have way too much time on their hands :lol: but you have to admit, the picture does have an eerie resemblance to Nick. :D

there are the asinine and the infantile. then there are those who for even a nano-second take things like this seriously.

-- -------- Post added at 03:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:37 PM ----------




That said, does anyone else think that people in general looked decidedly different back in those days than they do now ... I mean, even back to the 1920s or what have you, people looked different to how they do now ... can't explain it too well, but anyone else think that?

i've noticed that but for the most part it is probably just the styles that people went with back then and/or the photographic process used to produce the images. way more guys wore facial hair of some kind (fucking yuck on that), hairstyles were far different, clothing was different. pretty much everything exterior was different, so i don't find it strange that anyone would think that folks in the past looked a bit strange.

[LouCipherr]

there are the asinine and the infantile. then there are those who for even a nano-second take things like this seriously.

But you have to admit, it's fun (and funny) to consider the possibility. I mean, if anyone out there is a vampire that's been living for 100's of years, why not Nick Cage? :lol:

[zombieking]

well a very good theory for fun but come back to reality guys there is no such thing as vampires exist :)

[LouCipherr]

well a very good theory for fun but come back to reality guys there is no such thing as vampires exist :)

http://rlv.zcache.com/buzz_kill_tshirt-p235592999810217829yii5_400.jpg

:lol:

[zombieking]

http://rlv.zcache.com/buzz_kill_tshirt-p235592999810217829yii5_400.jpg

:lol:

It was important :p

[Mike70]

But you have to admit, it's fun (and funny) to consider the possibility. I mean, if anyone out there is a vampire that's been living for 100's of years, why not Nick Cage? :lol:

don't get me wrong, bro - i absolutely love it when shit like this comes along. i never fail to be amazed at what people will believe in.

[ProfessorChaos]

That said, does anyone else think that people in general looked decidedly different back in those days than they do now ... I mean, even back to the 1920s or what have you, people looked different to how they do now ... can't explain it too well, but anyone else think that?

i'd attribute that to our pussified and technologically dependent society that consumes horrible "food" and is in general, very physically inactive. people were perhaps less educated and enlightened a century or so ago, but they were also much tougher and more resilient, productive, driven, and all that jazz before television, dishwashers, computers, ipods, cars, chainsaws, etc, and all the other gadgets and luxuries we have in the modern age that make life so easy on us.

on topic: well, nic cage does suck....

[shootemindehead]

That guy from 1870 is probably a better actor.

[LouCipherr]

on topic: well, nic cage does suck....

http://ashleyenglish.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/fozzie11.jpg

Wakka wakka, he's here all week. :lol: :D

[Mike70]

That guy from 1870 is probably a better actor.

that's a given. the only thing cage has ever done is chew on scenery. maybe that's it - he's the rarest of all types of vampire, the type that sucks the life out of every movie he's in.

he's possibly the most over-hyped actor of this era.

[bassman]

on topic: well, nic cage does suck....


he's possibly the most over-hyped actor of this era.


While I would agree that his newer films do indeed suck, he still deserves some high praise for Raising Arizona and Leaving Las Vegas. I love those movies and think Cage was absolutely perfect for them. The Rock and Face/Off aren't too shabby, either. What can I say? I'm a sucker for the shoot em up action flicks, I guess....

[Danny]

been taken off ebay, rumoured to just be viral marketing for his upcoming vampire flick.