MinionZombie
04-Jul-2006, 07:08 PM
Retardation: Defined (http://www.religiouswatch.com/nw06c.htm#Patron_Saint_of_Patronisation)
This is complete and utter bullsh*t ... and another two interesting articles from the site:
In Your Face - Australian Big Brother sexual assault? (http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/inau06a.htm#In_Your_Face)
Nanny State Meets Opposition From Britain (http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/gch06.htm#Extremely_Unpopular_proposal)
In regards to the last one, the Labour "WE CONTROL YOU" gubment wants (to them) "distasteful" porn (which they make sound horrid, but they're really talking about bondage and simulation with fully - and clearly - consensual and paid workers). If some people like their doo-dah on the wilder and rough side, so what, the respective communities do not hurt anyone as it's all consensual. Now, while I personally think "b'ave" to it all, there is such a thing as freedom of speech and expression. Nobody's getting hurt and as there is no supportive evidence (at all) in favour of the gubment then legislation should never be based on taste. I just find it hilarious that they now refuse to publish the responses to the consultation because the majority opinion is against them ... long grass there it goes me thinks...
This is complete and utter bullsh*t ... and another two interesting articles from the site:
In Your Face - Australian Big Brother sexual assault? (http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/inau06a.htm#In_Your_Face)
Nanny State Meets Opposition From Britain (http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/gch06.htm#Extremely_Unpopular_proposal)
In regards to the last one, the Labour "WE CONTROL YOU" gubment wants (to them) "distasteful" porn (which they make sound horrid, but they're really talking about bondage and simulation with fully - and clearly - consensual and paid workers). If some people like their doo-dah on the wilder and rough side, so what, the respective communities do not hurt anyone as it's all consensual. Now, while I personally think "b'ave" to it all, there is such a thing as freedom of speech and expression. Nobody's getting hurt and as there is no supportive evidence (at all) in favour of the gubment then legislation should never be based on taste. I just find it hilarious that they now refuse to publish the responses to the consultation because the majority opinion is against them ... long grass there it goes me thinks...