Mike70
26-Jul-2006, 08:11 PM
against the use of eminent domain in cases where seized property will be used for private development. several other states are expected to follow suit.
for the love of all that is holy if you live in ohio get out and vote in nov. eminent domain is on the ballot here and we can all help put the fork in this disgusting, anachronistic practice. the law proposed in ohio would severly curtail the govts. ability to take property and would pretty well end its ability to take it for use in private development.
even if i didn't hate any and all forms of govt. authority i would still vote for this law. f*ck eminent domain and anyone who supports it.
shame, shame, shame on the US supreme court for backing govt. over the individual and backing scumbag developers (you know the lovely folks who bulldoze everything in sight to put up parking lots, strip malls, and suburb after suburb) over individual property owners.
http://www.channelcincinnati.com/news/9577361/detail.html
for the love of all that is holy if you live in ohio get out and vote in nov. eminent domain is on the ballot here and we can all help put the fork in this disgusting, anachronistic practice. the law proposed in ohio would severly curtail the govts. ability to take property and would pretty well end its ability to take it for use in private development.
even if i didn't hate any and all forms of govt. authority i would still vote for this law. f*ck eminent domain and anyone who supports it.
shame, shame, shame on the US supreme court for backing govt. over the individual and backing scumbag developers (you know the lovely folks who bulldoze everything in sight to put up parking lots, strip malls, and suburb after suburb) over individual property owners.
http://www.channelcincinnati.com/news/9577361/detail.html