Creepshow 3!!! [Archive]

capncnut

13-Oct-2006, 04:10 AM

Just found out about Creepshow 3 (why am I always the last to know these things?) and I'm not impressed one little bit. The movie poster indicates a budget of about $5! Again, this is another attempt by a no-mark to rape GAR of his ideas (I bow to you too, Mr King) and originality. When is all this madness gonna end?

DeadCentral

13-Oct-2006, 10:47 AM

Capn, this is terribly old news...my apologies that you just recently discovered it...
This film is being released by those infamous characters who brought us such greats as DAY OF THE DEAD2:Contagium (eeewwww, I hate writing that phrase) Taurus entertainment...and though I've heard a couple of things pointing in a positive direction about this venture...I think I'll pass on it out of sheer principle.

Danny

13-Oct-2006, 07:27 PM

this news is older than the cheese on a pizza hut pizza.

bassman

13-Oct-2006, 07:28 PM

Yeah, kinda old news.

I never saw "Creepshow 2". Is it worth a viewing?

Cody

13-Oct-2006, 07:33 PM

I just heard of this too...LOL

capncnut

13-Oct-2006, 07:45 PM

I never saw "Creepshow 2". Is it worth a viewing?

I would say a big ol' yes to that. It's not as good as the original but definitely worth a viewing or two. Michael Gornick is the director and Tom Savini has a cameo so it 'aint all bad. The final story is a cracker!

MinionZombie

15-Oct-2006, 01:00 PM

Yeah, while Creepshow 2 isn't as good as #1, it's still worth a viewing. The hitch-hiker tale is pretty kick ass. The DVD has a cool "making of" on it as well, sounds like it was a pretty trying production...

Creepshow 3 - BOOOOOOO (there's also a remake of Creepshow 1 by the same retards who abused GAR's work with Contagium in the works apparently).

The sooner this remake craze is over and this new 3-D technology gets in the better, I'd rather see 3-D versions of films than an endless, unimaginative line of sewage-like remakes (bar the odd one which is actually quite good - e.g. Hills Have Eyes 2006).

Danny

15-Oct-2006, 06:29 PM

Creepshow 3 - BOOOOOOO (there's also a remake of Creepshow 1 by the same retards who abused GAR's work with Contagium in the works apparently).

...why?, can they honestly think after contagium that they can imrpove on the origional writers and directors works?, i would personally love to be in the same room of these guys when one used the word "ro-shambo!".:elol:

capncnut

15-Oct-2006, 11:34 PM

The sooner this remake craze is over and this new 3-D technology gets in the better, I'd rather see 3-D versions of films than an endless, unimaginative line of sewage-like remakes (bar the odd one which is actually quite good - e.g. Hills Have Eyes 2006).

Exactly, that's why I'm not dismissing NOTLD3D. On the 'mainstream' remake front, I'm sick and f**king tired of it! I wonder how all this will look to a film historian who has to write about this s**t in the future? Not good, let me tell you. Some of the remakes have been okay; Hills, Texas, Dawn (as a standalone movie Dawn 04 would've been passable, as long as Dawn 78 wasn't tagged to it!) but some have been downright poor, The Fog being the chief candidate. I want an end to this, the sooner the better!

suicide22

13-May-2007, 01:07 PM

I was going to import it, buy I changed my mind becuase of all the bad reviews on www.amazon.com, but I really liked creepshow 2?

MinionZombie

13-May-2007, 06:46 PM

Creepshow 3 is from those mofos at Taurus who are systematically cashing in on/raping the good work of Romero for their own pathetic means.

Creepshow 3 has f*ck all to do with the originals nor the original crew. There's also a Creepshow remake in the works apparently, again by those Taurus wankers, so that's gonna be a huge dick blister in itself.

triste realtà

13-May-2007, 10:45 PM

And the kicker...
Romero said in that video interview that he would love to do another Creepshow with King and it's a shame whoever owns the name is selling it out so cheaply.

New Creepshow site I found:
www.creepshowcreeps.com

EvilNed

13-May-2007, 11:16 PM

Am I the only one who thought Creepshow 2 sucked?

capncnut

13-May-2007, 11:23 PM

Nope. Most folks I know think it's s**t but I don't mind it.

MinionZombie

13-May-2007, 11:55 PM

The first one rules, the second has it's moments, but is overall a bit naff ... but it'd stomp the balls of 3 with ease, and the gheay remake coming up. :mad:

Cody

14-May-2007, 01:37 AM

wow this thread is old.

fartpants

17-May-2007, 04:23 PM

i loved the second one '' thanks for the ride lady '' , priceless

capncnut

17-May-2007, 07:12 PM

Yeah, I don't think it's as bad a s people make out. It does exactly what it says on the tin...

DVW5150

19-May-2007, 01:24 PM

LMAO...
What about the black slime in the lake? It was a good part but ...

MinionZombie

19-May-2007, 01:37 PM

LMAO...
What about the black slime in the lake? It was a good part but ...
lol, ahhh the black goo in the lake...

What always confuses me is the odd 'sort of sex scene' in it...so you're lying on a raft in a lake surrounded by killer goo and two of your friends are dead, so the dude rolls his tongue all over the chick's body while she's sleeping...that's pretty f*cked up...as well as really bizarre, because surely you've got other things on your mind! :stunned:

capncnut

20-May-2007, 03:23 AM

MinionZombie

20-May-2007, 12:14 PM

Well, the guys technically raping his mates missus. :confused:

For some reason I always saw it as a dream-type sequence even though the film presents it as reality. Classic ending to that story btw.

I liked the first story with George Kennedy and that guy from Fight Club about the Old Indian Chief. Corny as hell but it's proper entertainment! :D
THANKS FOR THE RIDE, LADY!

That was my favourite of the three in the flick, that wobbly, bloody head with no discernible features jiggling at the car door, hahaha, classic.

capncnut

20-May-2007, 10:42 PM

"Venus fly traps... they eat MEAT!" :D

MissJacksonCA

21-May-2007, 05:47 AM

Bah! I loved creepshow one ...two wasn't thaaaaaat great I liked the lake story... dont get the hitchhiker one... and the indian one was kinda silly. I'm looking forward to the new one though this is the first i've heard of it.

capncnut

21-May-2007, 05:51 AM

You don't want to see this one MissJackson... it looks awful.

slickwilly13

08-Jun-2008, 09:06 PM

I watched it yesterday on youtube. It had some funny moments, but doesn't have **** on the 2 true Creepshows. Some decent gore on some stories. They all innertwine, btw. Kind of like Pulp Fiction. I think people would give this movie more of a chance if it was called something else besides Creepshow 3, because it is not that.

MaximusIncredulous

09-Jun-2008, 01:06 AM

Creep 1 is my fav. Pure fun, filled with devilish exuberance, and a great score. 2 seemed very tired in comparison.

iluvc2h5oh

09-Jun-2008, 03:01 AM

1 had Ms Ross in it did it not?

and the roaches were awesome when I was like 10....

I liked 2 more though.......The lake was great and

I can still say thanks for the ride lady and people know what i am talking about....horror fans and not...

MinionZombie

09-Jun-2008, 11:40 AM

#1 was awesome.

#2 had moments, but was generally lower budget and it did drag. 5 stories was great, it kept things moving, whereas only 3 made it drag a bit. There wasn't enough action either, a lot of talk, or a lot of tame action with a few splashes of the good stuff. Certainly disappointing, but I like the story behind its creation, it felt more like a bunch of guys having a laugh (even if it was trying at times) and just out there making a movie, which I like.

#3, which isn't even #3 anyway, can suck the sh*t out of various arses.

slickwilly13

09-Jun-2008, 02:59 PM

Anyone watched part 3, yet?

Yojimbo

10-Jun-2008, 01:23 AM

And the kicker...
Romero said in that video interview that he would love to do another Creepshow with King and it's a shame whoever owns the name is selling it out so cheaply.

Is that someone Richard Rubenstein? It would make sense, for he is but a maggot feeding off of Romero's talent and has been for years. Although I do not know the exact reason why Romero and Rubenstein are on the outs, I would venture to guess it is because of Rubenstein's maggotyness, even though that is probabaly not a real word but applies to Rubenstein so I will take license here.