PDA

View Full Version : Diary of the Dead might suck.



Chaos
12-Dec-2006, 02:53 AM
We have to accept reality here. Romero isn't getting any younger and the preliminary reports from Toronto, concerning Diary, aren't sounding too promising. Romero's age and health are becoming a factor, I think. His lungs and ticker are about to go, due to the fact he's been chainsmoking two packs a day for 50 years. Senility is catching up with him too, i'm afraid. It happens to all senior citizens.

If he fails to deliver on Diary, like he did with Land, then i'm writing him off completely. Two sub-par zombie films from the man who invented the modern zombie genre is unacceptable, and I hope he'll retire and bout out gracefully if Diary turns out as bad as Land did.

Romero needs his friends and fans to tell him to retire if Diary turns out the way I think it might. He doesn't need to diminish his reputation any further.

I think it's hard on aging people. Look at how many fighters attempt to make comebacks when they are far past their prime. I think Romero might be doing the same thing.

I could be proven wrong though. We'll wait and see the finished product, although i'm not entirely optomistic at the point.

coma
12-Dec-2006, 03:46 AM
We have to accept reality here. Romero isn't getting any younger and the preliminary reports from Toronto, concerning Diary, aren't sounding too promising. Romero's age and health are becoming a factor, I think. His lungs and ticker are about to go, due to the fact he's been chainsmoking two packs a day for 50 years. Senility is catching up with him too, i'm afraid. It happens to all senior citizens.

pe he'll retire and bout out gracefully if Diary turns out as bad as Land did.


Dude, he's like 65, not 80. and all old people DON"T go senile. The health thing, thats a factor, but senile?
When he gives interviews he is totally on the ball.

Chaos
12-Dec-2006, 04:10 AM
Dude, he's like 65, not 80. and all old people DON"T go senile. The health thing, thats a factor, but senile?
When he gives interviews he is totally on the ball.

He will be sixty-seven in February. He's no spring chicken. He's my grandfather's age and my grandfather is a senile old bastard. I think Romero might be in the early stages of Alzheimers but i'm still not entirely sure about that. We'll have to wait and see how Diary pans out. But if it ends up sucking, i'm thinking senility or Alzheimer's will definitely be the reason why.

Sure, he seems sharp during interviews but so did Reagan during his speeches, and he had Alzheimer's during his second term and nobody was told about it until he was nearly dead.

Or we'll have to just accept the fact that maybe Romero is out of good ideas and unable to make quality movies anymore. Just look at Stephen King. He hasn't wrote anything worth a damn in a long time. The concept of "The Cell" was good but it failed to materialize into something special, like his older work.

The Alive Man
12-Dec-2006, 07:03 AM
If he fails to deliver on Diary, like he did with Land, then i'm writing him off completely. Two sub-par zombie films from the man who invented the modern zombie genre is unacceptable, and I hope he'll retire and bout out gracefully if Diary turns out as bad as Land did.




Man... get a clue. And FAST, please.

Neil
12-Dec-2006, 08:12 AM
He's my grandfather's age and my grandfather is a senile old bastard.

Maybe that's just something that runs in your family? :D

joeharley666
12-Dec-2006, 10:52 AM
start hanging with your own grand pappy then. if your grandfather is 65 then you are in your early 20's which explains for your lack of intelligence here.

sorry guys for anyone else who is in their 20's here, this was not directed towards you.

you keep sticking with this theory that if George craps out on this one the way he did with "land" then it must be senility. you are a moron my friend. everyone has a right to their opinion here but maybe Neil is right.......it runs in your family.

I didn't like "land" either, but watching george doing interview after interview, i highly doubt he has a senility problem, he may cheese out on "diary" like he did with "land" but it has nothing to do with him being 67 years old.

I for one am still a believer in good ole George and I do have faith in him, every director is allowed a cheeseball in their career....but I will still wait for the final product before I make any judgements.:kiss:

DjfunkmasterG
12-Dec-2006, 11:10 AM
Maybe that's just something that runs in your family? :D


Damn Neil, you took the words right out of my mouth.


Hey Chaos, how do you know he is senile? Describe the signs of senility. Have you ever talked to Romero on the set of Land or Diary? I am just curious what would make another person say that.

BTW, My father is 73 and as sharp as a ginzu knife. Just because the cheese slid off your grandfathers cracker at 65 doesn't mean everyone's will.

Neil
12-Dec-2006, 11:18 AM
My other half's grandmother is 94!!!! She has failing eye-sight and bad knees etc, but is still amazing "on the ball" considering her age!!

sirjacktorrance
12-Dec-2006, 11:27 AM
i think land has a very inteligent script.

tju1973
12-Dec-2006, 12:08 PM
We have to accept reality here. Romero isn't getting any younger and the preliminary reports from Toronto, concerning Diary, aren't sounding too promising. Romero's age and health are becoming a factor, I think. His lungs and ticker are about to go, due to the fact he's been chainsmoking two packs a day for 50 years. Senility is catching up with him too, i'm afraid. It happens to all senior citizens.

If he fails to deliver on Diary, like he did with Land, then i'm writing him off completely. Two sub-par zombie films from the man who invented the modern zombie genre is unacceptable, and I hope he'll retire and bout out gracefully if Diary turns out as bad as Land did.

Romero needs his friends and fans to tell him to retire if Diary turns out the way I think it might. He doesn't need to diminish his reputation any further.

I think it's hard on aging people. Look at how many fighters attempt to make comebacks when they are far past their prime. I think Romero might be doing the same thing.

I could be proven wrong though. We'll wait and see the finished product, although i'm not entirely optomistic at the point.

I think your logic is crud...Its like "shooting the horse that got you there".
Is GAR older-- yeah, so am I. Land may be the weakest of the 4 so far, but that does not discount his ability to make great movies on a limited budget. What would Land have been with a bigger budget and no ratings limitations by the studio and the MPAA?

A better film...but he did ok with the limits he was giving.


Yep, old George is always ok in my book-- if only for what he has given us...

:)

SymphonicX
12-Dec-2006, 12:11 PM
We have to accept reality here. Romero isn't getting any younger and the preliminary reports from Toronto, concerning Diary, aren't sounding too promising. Romero's age and health are becoming a factor, I think. His lungs and ticker are about to go, due to the fact he's been chainsmoking two packs a day for 50 years. Senility is catching up with him too, i'm afraid. It happens to all senior citizens.

If he fails to deliver on Diary, like he did with Land, then i'm writing him off completely. Two sub-par zombie films from the man who invented the modern zombie genre is unacceptable, and I hope he'll retire and bout out gracefully if Diary turns out as bad as Land did.

Romero needs his friends and fans to tell him to retire if Diary turns out the way I think it might. He doesn't need to diminish his reputation any further.

I think it's hard on aging people. Look at how many fighters attempt to make comebacks when they are far past their prime. I think Romero might be doing the same thing.

I could be proven wrong though. We'll wait and see the finished product, although i'm not entirely optomistic at the point.


I guess it's OK to be sceptical about the movie, but the reasons you're being sceptical don't make much sense in reality. To draw a comparison between being a film director and a firefighter is pretty ridiculous, to be honest...I mean, he's not actually fighting off zombies - he's seeing a project through and I'm sure if he was too ill to carry on he wouldn't be in the chair.

And not all "senior citizens" get alzheimers...its a disease that's usually heriditary as someone else here said...to draw a conclusion just from his age is erroneous - and only serves to damage your cynical attitude towards Romero's new movie.

Just wait for the flick dude.

DVW5150
12-Dec-2006, 02:10 PM
Assuming that some info we can get will either strengthen or weaken our opinion about a film that has not yet been released , will change what the film is . Okay ... lets just please wait until the film is released .... Remember when Kubrick was filming "Full Metal Jacket"? There were reports that it was gonna be horrible . It turned out (in my humble opinion) to be a really great piece of film ... Alien , which was shot at Shepperton Studios in England , under sever security , had rumors that it would be celuliod turd . So lets please wait ? OK .:skull:

I wish that George A Romero would read this thread ... :skull:


We have to accept reality here. Romero isn't getting any younger and the preliminary reports from Toronto, concerning Diary, aren't sounding too promising. Romero's age and health are becoming a factor, I think. His lungs and ticker are about to go, due to the fact he's been chainsmoking two packs a day for 50 years. Senility is catching up with him too, i'm afraid. It happens to all senior citizens.

If he fails to deliver on Diary, like he did with Land, then i'm writing him off completely. Two sub-par zombie films from the man who invented the modern zombie genre is unacceptable, and I hope he'll retire and bout out gracefully if Diary turns out as bad as Land did.

Romero needs his friends and fans to tell him to retire if Diary turns out the way I think it might. He doesn't need to diminish his reputation any further.

I think it's hard on aging people. Look at how many fighters attempt to make comebacks when they are far past their prime. I think Romero might be doing the same thing.

I could be proven wrong though. We'll wait and see the finished product, although i'm not entirely optomistic at the point.....Please , Chaos, from our brief conversations in chat , you seem to be quite a sharp individual . Just give this film the chance it deserves buddy ... I believe that we will all be pleasantly surprised ....Peace .:lol:

capncnut
12-Dec-2006, 03:21 PM
I'd give my left testicle to be 12 again. :rolleyes:

tju1973
12-Dec-2006, 03:33 PM
I'd give my left testicle to be 12 again. :rolleyes:

I am married, so I lost mine years ago...:dead:

Deadman_Deluxe
12-Dec-2006, 04:14 PM
I think it's hard on aging people. Look at how many fighters attempt to make comebacks when they are far past their prime. I think Romero might be doing the same thing.


Do you really think that making a movie can be held in the same context as a contact sport? I don't see any comparrison to be honest.

Also, i didn't consider LAND to be a "sub par" zombie movie. While you may not see it as GARs best work to date, it STILL stands head and shoulders above the majority of zombie movies released in the last twenty years.

bassman
12-Dec-2006, 04:28 PM
To say that you'll completely "write him off" is a bit extreme and quite frankly, makes you come off as a bit of an imbecile.

Every artist has work that doesn't stand out as well as the rest. Doesn't mean that the other works aren't worth experiencing.

Cereval
12-Dec-2006, 04:28 PM
Overwhelmingly skeptical forecasts are just as interesting as the bulletproof fanboy perspectives. It seems like these two sides always pit themselves against each other by posts that bait the opposition. The common skeptic points I read are always surrounding Romero's age and the success of Land of the Dead, or even his overall track record. In these positions, it's rarely acknowledged that the guy's been making films for 40 years and is still chugging along. Few blockbuster and critically acclaimed filmmakers can boast this. On the other side, there's this blanket notion that everything Romero does is gold. Obviously, this bias lends itself to denial and favoritism, which I suppose is to be expected.

Personally, I haven't liked everything George has done, but there are certain things that I love and revere about the man and his work. It's this respect that I use as a basis for talking about the guy and what he's done or is doing. When I hear things along the lines of Romero being too old or not being able to make a good movie, all I hear is something like fanboy regression - that stage of appreciation where bitterness or shame has set in from lack of appeasement that matches previous times or eras. The feeling of failure to the fans, the "where's Superman?" abandonment syndrome weighes heavily on the minds of what truly are honest and anxious fans.

Because that's all we are: fans.

Maybe sometimes when we get too negative, we should remember this. We sit high on our recliner thrones sometimes praising the hard work of others and pissing the ones that don't gain our approval. Meanwhile, the people we criticize are entertaining and even inspiring others.

This is not so much directed at you, Chaos. Your post brought to mind the bigger issue of fans and critics. I don't share you opinion. But even though you make points that may hold some kind of validity, it's far from a balanced argument to state your disdain as fact. In my own personal opinion, the man is gold if not always the stuff he does. This lends credence to my viewpoints, be it criticism or praise.

coma
12-Dec-2006, 04:41 PM
He will be sixty-seven in February. He's no spring chicken. He's my grandfather's age and my grandfather is a senile old bastard. I think Romero might be in the early stages of Alzheimers but i'm still not entirely sure about that. We'll have to wait and see how Diary pans out. But if it ends up sucking, i'm thinking senility or Alzheimer's will definitely be the reason why.

Reagans speeches were PRE WRITTEN. And in interviews (such as numerous court proceedings) he came off as a clueless buffoon. At least in his second term. When you have to spotaneously speak is when it really shows. At the time, if one was old enough to understand what was going on as it transpired, it was fairly obvious. When he kept saying "I don't remember" we thought he was lying. He wasn't.

There has not been ONE person in my family, on either side, to go senile.
My Mom is almost the same age as GAR and shes sharp as a tack. My Grandmother died at 82, slightly forgetful as is normal, but totally aware.
I saw Clint Eastwood on the crap Larry King show last night and he's 75 and totally together.
You want to think he now sucks, that's for you. I dont agree and I think you are projecting you Grandfathers siruation as being universsal. It isn't.

HLS
12-Dec-2006, 10:47 PM
Do you really think that making a movie can be held in the same context as a contact sport? I don't see any comparrison to be honest.

Also, i didn't consider LAND to be a "sub par" zombie movie. While you may not see it as GARs best work to date, it STILL stands head and shoulders above the majority of zombie movies released in the last twenty years.

I agree. Romero is still the best at zombie films. I know some of us were disappointed at Land, but I think that is the fault of Universal not Romero.
And how does anything have to do with senility? (sp?) I think Chaos went over the edge on this.

Chaos
13-Dec-2006, 12:50 AM
Overwhelmingly skeptical forecasts are just as interesting as the bulletproof fanboy perspectives. It seems like these two sides always pit themselves against each other by posts that bait the opposition. The common skeptic points I read are always surrounding Romero's age and the success of Land of the Dead, or even his overall track record. In these positions, it's rarely acknowledged that the guy's been making films for 40 years and is still chugging along. Few blockbuster and critically acclaimed filmmakers can boast this. On the other side, there's this blanket notion that everything Romero does is gold. Obviously, this bias lends itself to denial and favoritism, which I suppose is to be expected.

Personally, I haven't liked everything George has done, but there are certain things that I love and revere about the man and his work. It's this respect that I use as a basis for talking about the guy and what he's done or is doing. When I hear things along the lines of Romero being too old or not being able to make a good movie, all I hear is something like fanboy regression - that stage of appreciation where bitterness or shame has set in from lack of appeasement that matches previous times or eras. The feeling of failure to the fans, the "where's Superman?" abandonment syndrome weighes heavily on the minds of what truly are honest and anxious fans.

Because that's all we are: fans.

Maybe sometimes when we get too negative, we should remember this. We sit high on our recliner thrones sometimes praising the hard work of others and pissing the ones that don't gain our approval. Meanwhile, the people we criticize are entertaining and even inspiring others.

This is not so much directed at you, Chaos. Your post brought to mind the bigger issue of fans and critics. I don't share you opinion. But even though you make points that may hold some kind of validity, it's far from a balanced argument to state your disdain as fact. In my own personal opinion, the man is gold if not always the stuff he does. This lends credence to my viewpoints, be it criticism or praise.

I definitely dig what you're saying. Romero is gold in my book too. I'm just saying he's been dropping the ball of late. I would love to see Diary deliver in the places where Land certainly failed. Two stinkers in a row is unacceptable for a filmmaker of his caliber.

And I still stand on the senility remark if Diary flops. Either that, or maybe he just doesn't have it in him anymore. I see the move to Toronto as a bad omen, just like when Seinfeld moved from New York to Los Angeles. The series soon went downhill after that.

This is just my opinion though, peeps. I know i'm cool and all but don't be afraid to form one for yourselves. It won't kill ya!

Neil
13-Dec-2006, 09:15 AM
We'll see when we see :)

Personally I don't think Romero "dropped the ball" with Land... It wasn't as good IMHO as the original three, but it was a reasonably good flick...

DjfunkmasterG
13-Dec-2006, 10:47 AM
I definitely dig what you're saying. Romero is gold in my book too. I'm just saying he's been dropping the ball of late. I would love to see Diary deliver in the places where Land certainly failed. Two stinkers in a row is unacceptable for a filmmaker of his caliber.

And I still stand on the senility remark if Diary flops. Either that, or maybe he just doesn't have it in him anymore. I see the move to Toronto as a bad omen, just like when Seinfeld moved from New York to Los Angeles. The series soon went downhill after that.

This is just my opinion though, peeps. I know i'm cool and all but don't be afraid to form one for yourselves. It won't kill ya!

You think you're cool... however with dumb statements like your original post you come off like a blubbering imbecile. Welcome to medicority chaos... enjoy your stay.

MinionZombie
13-Dec-2006, 11:04 AM
The original three had 20 years and more of loyal fanbase following and cult status before Land came along. The 20 year gap between Day and Land made some people build up so many expectations that Romero couldn't possibly deliver to satisfy them in a million years - that's the inherent problem with fanbase expectation.

Yet Day of the Dead was a complete failure initially, but found it's audience on DVD - Land has already proven to have been a success and has done very well on DVD. Land is still the new kid on the block, but I really like the film, it's different to the other three movies. It retains what it needs to from the first three, but also goes in it's own direction.

Much like Dawn did after Night and Day did after Dawn.

My expectations for Diary were a bit muddled and lower than usual, but that was mainly due to first impressions and how Romero tried to explain it in the 'press release' of sorts. Since seeing and hearing more about it over the past few weeks, my interest is growing. I'm not expecting anything, just getting more interested/excited to see it.

With Romero returning to the indie scene after a somewhat-departure throughout the 1990s, I'm looking forward to seeing an invigorated GAR going out there and going crazy over filmmaking again.

One last time - I liked Land, it's a good movie.

Chaos
13-Dec-2006, 09:34 PM
Welcome to medicority... enjoy your stay.

Sounds like the perfect tagline for your movie, DJ! :lol:

DjfunkmasterG
13-Dec-2006, 10:08 PM
Ha ha ha so clever. Woot did you think that up all by yourself?

Like I said I never set out to be the next Romero, can't beat or copycat the original. Also you shouldn't talk **** because you haven't seen the film. Of course a loser like yourself only knows how to degrade and belittle someone's effort without looking into or watching the final product. You are one in ten on IMDB maybe you should hang out there more often. You fit in with those people.

BTW has your senile grandfather... ooops better go get him he is walking in traffic.

Danny
13-Dec-2006, 11:43 PM
this guys posting some pretty juvenile stuff lately.

but on the topic of the thread, no a director never "loses it" he make make a bad film, but that doesnt mean he suddenyl "gets ****" and starts making nothing but stinkers, look at uwe boll, you either can make films well or you cant.

though i think george lucas is the exception to the rule.

unless he's gone senile, which would explain the phantom menace.

HLS
13-Dec-2006, 11:50 PM
Ha ha ha so clever. Woot did you think that up all by yourself?

Like I said I never set out to be the next Romero, can't beat or copycat the original. Also you shouldn't talk **** because you haven't seen the film. Of course a loser like yourself only knows how to degrade and belittle someone's effort without looking into or watching the final product. You are one in ten on IMDB maybe you should hang out there more often. You fit in with those people.

BTW has your senile grandfather... ooops better go get him he is walking in traffic.


Do not waist your energy on Chaos. He is not worth it. He is just wanting attention. Everyone at HPOTD likes you so his opinion counts for nothing.

Chaos
14-Dec-2006, 04:39 AM
Do not waist your energy on Chaos. He is not worth it. He is just wanting attention. Everyone at HPOTD likes you so his opinion counts for nothing.

Personal attacks directed at me because of my opinion regarding DJ's disappointing film debut and the state of Romero's mental health are uncalled for and a bit juvenile.

You need a shrink, not a message board. I think you should talk to a professional about your many deep seeded neuroses. They are obviously effecting your personal life and the time spent on this forum.

Let this serve as a warning to anyone, and I mean ANYONE, who chooses to let something as insignificant as a post on a message board, be turned into a personal attack on my character (or anyone elses for that matter).

Sure, I might be the new guy but i'm nobody's doormat.

Here's a tip: Get a clue!

We're all here because we're fans. Let's not lose sight of that.

strayrider
14-Dec-2006, 06:29 AM
Fantastic!

Here we are discussing how lame or great GAR's next Dead film will pan out!

8 years ago the topic on this forum was "Will GAR ever make another Dead film?"

Fantastic!

:D

-stray-

DjfunkmasterG
14-Dec-2006, 10:38 AM
Personal attacks directed at me because of my opinion regarding DJ's disappointing film debut and the state of Romero's mental health are uncalled for and a bit juvenile.

You need a shrink, not a message board. I think you should talk to a professional about your many deep seeded neuroses. They are obviously effecting your personal life and the time spent on this forum.

Let this serve as a warning to anyone, and I mean ANYONE, who chooses to let something as insignificant as a post on a message board, be turned into a personal attack on my character (or anyone elses for that matter).

Sure, I might be the new guy but i'm nobody's doormat.

Here's a tip: Get a clue!

We're all here because we're fans. Let's not lose sight of that.

Chaos... in the giant scheme of HPotD you're nothing. Assholes like yourself have come and gone. Like I mentioned in another thread check the member list of the numerous banned accounts. You're just another svengoolie but at least he had tact. You just lack any educated professionalism and I doubt you last another 90 days. So shoo fly shoo.

Kaos
14-Dec-2006, 01:32 PM
Personal attacks directed at me because of my opinion regarding DJ's disappointing film debut and the state of Romero's mental health are uncalled for and a bit juvenile.


How is it an attack or juvenile when they are merely providing their opinion of the quality of your posts?

It is a tad duplicitous to call someone's effort mediocre and then cry when someone is not charitable in describing your effort.

I am closing the thread, at least temporarily, in order to give the mods an opportunity to review it without it spiraling into a full on flame war. Stay tuned.

Neil
15-Dec-2006, 09:33 AM
I've re-opened the thread... Please let's have some peace and goodwill!

DeadCentral
16-Dec-2006, 03:53 AM
Overwhelmingly skeptical forecasts are just as interesting as the bulletproof fanboy perspectives. It seems like these two sides always pit themselves against each other by posts that bait the opposition. The common skeptic points I read are always surrounding Romero's age and the success of Land of the Dead, or even his overall track record. In these positions, it's rarely acknowledged that the guy's been making films for 40 years and is still chugging along. Few blockbuster and critically acclaimed filmmakers can boast this. On the other side, there's this blanket notion that everything Romero does is gold. Obviously, this bias lends itself to denial and favoritism, which I suppose is to be expected.

Personally, I haven't liked everything George has done, but there are certain things that I love and revere about the man and his work. It's this respect that I use as a basis for talking about the guy and what he's done or is doing. When I hear things along the lines of Romero being too old or not being able to make a good movie, all I hear is something like fanboy regression - that stage of appreciation where bitterness or shame has set in from lack of appeasement that matches previous times or eras. The feeling of failure to the fans, the "where's Superman?" abandonment syndrome weighes heavily on the minds of what truly are honest and anxious fans.

Because that's all we are: fans.

Maybe sometimes when we get too negative, we should remember this. We sit high on our recliner thrones sometimes praising the hard work of others and pissing the ones that don't gain our approval. Meanwhile, the people we criticize are entertaining and even inspiring others.

This is not so much directed at you, Chaos. Your post brought to mind the bigger issue of fans and critics. I don't share you opinion. But even though you make points that may hold some kind of validity, it's far from a balanced argument to state your disdain as fact. In my own personal opinion, the man is gold if not always the stuff he does. This lends credence to my viewpoints, be it criticism or praise.


Well said Cereval..
There are a few of Georges films I can pass on too, but in general I love the mans effort to entertain and maintain contact with his fans through his films... he has been at it a very long time and has etched his mark in the film industry, thats unmistakable.... not all the DEAD films are perfect, but they are superior to all of the blatant rip offs who claim George as their inspiration and then trash his schematics for the zombie lore ...
flawed as they may be , his films do indeed stand the test of time and that is a testimonial to any film makers skills...

Danny
16-Dec-2006, 12:41 PM
yeah, its cus of people like that who made it so damn near all zombie movies need a "if you get bitten you become one", granted that was hinted at in day but did he ever turn?, no. in the night films if they get bit then die of infection then theyl get up cus some unkown thing is causing all dead to rise, no some damn flu type virus, but thanks to people who rip off romero thats all we have in zombie movies now, and if dj doesnt use the "annoying somones got bitten" scene most **** zombie films do in deadlands 2, which he didnt in deadlands: the rising, hes one of few people who really are sticking to the same mythos and not trying to do the damn plague thing, cus lets face it its been done to death, then becuase of a zombie "plague" it got up, then it was killed again.:barf:

dmbfanintn
18-Dec-2006, 07:03 PM
To say that you'll completely "write him off" is a bit extreme and quite frankly, makes you come off as a bit of an imbecile.

Every artist has work that doesn't stand out as well as the rest. Doesn't mean that the other works aren't worth experiencing.

Bassman,

LOVE the reefer madness gif!!!


Personal attacks directed at me because of my opinion regarding DJ's disappointing film debut and the state of Romero's mental health are uncalled for and a bit juvenile.

You need a shrink, not a message board. I think you should talk to a professional about your many deep seeded neuroses. They are obviously effecting your personal life and the time spent on this forum.

Let this serve as a warning to anyone, and I mean ANYONE, who chooses to let something as insignificant as a post on a message board, be turned into a personal attack on my character (or anyone elses for that matter).

Sure, I might be the new guy but i'm nobody's doormat.

Here's a tip: Get a clue!

We're all here because we're fans. Let's not lose sight of that.

Here's a reasonable question Chaos, have you seen DJs movie?

If not, how can you call it a dissapointing debut? It sounds like you just threw that out there as a defense.

Another one, "Let this serve as a warning" :lol: :lol: :lol: Are you fvcking serious. Do you really think ANYONE is going to read that and actually take you seriously? You throw out something like that protecting your "Character" and then you've got a big confederate rag in your signature. Gimme a break!

There's your warning everyone, don't insult Chaos or he'll get mad and, and, well...... write something! OOOOOOO!!!!!! "Let this serve as a warning" OMFG I haven't laughed so freaking hard in ages!

Dude, aren't you the same guy that started the whole argument over the racist confederate rag? Ease up and try to fit in a little better before you start going around pissing people off, Let that serve a as a warning to you!!!:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Chaos
18-Dec-2006, 10:26 PM
Bassman,

LOVE the reefer madness gif!!!



Here's a reasonable question Chaos, have you seen DJs movie?

If not, how can you call it a dissapointing debut? It sounds like you just threw that out there as a defense.

Another one, "Let this serve as a warning" :lol: :lol: :lol: Are you fvcking serious. Do you really think ANYONE is going to read that and actually take you seriously? You throw out something like that protecting your "Character" and then you've got a big confederate rag in your signature. Gimme a break!

There's your warning everyone, don't insult Chaos or he'll get mad and, and, well...... write something! OOOOOOO!!!!!! "Let this serve as a warning" OMFG I haven't laughed so freaking hard in ages!

Dude, aren't you the same guy that started the whole argument over the racist confederate rag? Ease up and try to fit in a little better before you start going around pissing people off, Let that serve a as a warning to you!!!:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Yeah, and i've seen your pic. You are morbidly obese and live in Tennessee. And speaking of the Confederacy seceding from the Union, maybe your lumpy ass needs to secede from the refrigerator?

Don't even lecture me about "fitting" in either. Your fat ass hasn't been an easy fit for anything in quite some time, I would imagine.

And FYI, as of yesterday, this was a non-issue. But since you insisted on digging up old bones, this is what you get for not letting sleeping corpses lie.

Oh, and by the way, have a Merry Christmas! :elol:

Kaos
19-Dec-2006, 04:13 AM
Oh, and by the way, have a Merry Christmas! :elol:

My gift to the community this holiday season is to close this thread. :) Since ithe thread has degenerated to flaming (and to not very clever flaming at that) I believe only the flamers will be upset by this action.