Which do you all dislike more.

[Doc]

Heh heh! Since lot of people dislike them alot. I want to know which is more disliked. :D

[3pidemiC]

It would be the shock of a lifetime if Dawn '04 won this one.

Really, Dawn '04 is good for a popcorn action flick.

[Mike70]

yeah dawn04 for all of its myriad flaws is a fooking masterpiece beside the 3d remake of night.

[MinionZombie]

I voted Yawn04 - unsurprisingly.

Night3D was always going to be utter gash, but Yawn04 thinks it's good, but it's just sh*te.

I would go into all the arguments, but I've done so many times, give it a forum search to see my specifics.

And no, despite the name-rape of it all, even if it wasn't called Dawn of the Dead, I'd still consider it to be a sh*te movie.

[bd2999]

I knew NotLD 3D was going to be bad but it was terrible. So I did not care for it much at all and it wins.

The Dawn of the Dead remake does not touch the original but it is a decent zombie action film if you can ignore the title. There are many flaws with it, of course, and I could rant about those for a while, but at the same time I think its alright. I get a little annoyed about people saying certain things about the movie, like it started the running zombies thing and how original it was, but people are stupid. What are you going to do?

[bd2999]

I knew NotLD 3D was going to be bad but it was terrible. So I did not care for it much at all and it wins.

The Dawn of the Dead remake does not touch the original but it is a decent zombie action film if you can ignore the title. There are many flaws with it, of course, and I could rant about those for a while, but at the same time I think its alright. I get a little annoyed about people saying certain things about the movie, like it started the running zombies thing and how original it was, but people are stupid. What are you going to do?

[capncnut]

Yawn 04 by a long shot. At least Night 3D didn't try to hide the fact that it's 'below par'.

[Doc]

but Yawn04 thinks it's good, but it's just sh*te. Maybe because it is a good film......for the audience of today of course. I tell you man people praise Dawn '04 like some masterpiece. Which IMO it isn't a bad film, but a masterpiece? What's worst people are saying that defeats every other Romero film......:rockbrow: WTF? I agree that it defiantly beats Land, but in no way defeats the original Night, Dawn and Day and Romero's other non-dead flicks.

I still blame the audience.....I mean its like they want something to blow up every 5 mins and nothing, but non-stop action.....which I admit I was like that to.....but yeah some people watching 28 Day later were even like "Where are the explosions"?



I would go into all the arguments, but I've done so many times, give it a forum search to see my specifics.

Which threads would you recommend?:lol:

[ProfessorChaos]

i chose night 3d, but was wondering: where's the inclusion of day of the dead 2008? that movie is gonna be terrible!

[Doc]

i chose night 3d, but was wondering: where's the inclusion of day of the dead 2008? that movie is gonna be terrible! 1. It hasn't released yet
2. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that film will flop
3. Now thats not fair! it would be winning by land slide right now if I'd put it.

[Mutineer]

I swear to god

The credibility of the members of this forum sometimes amuses me

Disliking DAWN 04 over NIGHT 3D ?

There are more UNDEAD DUDS on this circuit than gems and DAWN 04 is a rarity; popcorn perhaps and not too be taken with any seriousness, but then again, who takes DAWN 78 or any other good dead film seriously ?

:annoyed: :annoyed: :annoyed:

[bassman]

but then again, who takes DAWN 78 or any other good dead film seriously ?



Here's one...

*looks around and waits for others*

I take Romeros films seriously that is.

[MinionZombie]

Mutineer - shockingly, people have varying opinions. :p

Bassman - here's another one

I think many of the members here take Romero's films seriously, otherwise why would we be bothered to show up on a forum and website dedicated to them and get into long-winded discussions about them?

I mean for crying out loud, there was a discussion recently concerning money where we listed the practicalities of a new currency over the existing dollar! :)

[Mutineer]

Having an opinion is always the best way out of the argument for someone who can't justify the reasoning no matter how subjective.

Likeing LAND over DAWN 04 is subjective even though I can't see it, but liking NIGHT 3D over DAWN 04 is just mind boggling. You have classic (Night and Dawn and Day), Popcorn (Dawn 04, 28 Days Later) and then there is ****e:

NIGHT 3D, DAY Remake, The Return sequels released last year ....

-

I take the DEAD films as serious as I do any other film, but always laughed at the 'social commentary genius' critics have showered o nROmero's films.

They're horror films. There isn't anything terribly deep about them even if the subject matter is adult and serious in some nature. DAWN taking place in a mall suddenly became 'American Consumerism' created by Romero.

No. It took place in a mall.

Ah well. Film is coll in what we get out of it and what it means. I just cannot fathom anyone liking NIGHT 3D over DAWN 04. :annoyed:

It just seems to convenient and premeditated at times.

-

I have always stood by the fact that Romero simply made a horror film that became a Cult Classic. That's about it. There isn't anything deep about the films. It's not like Schindler's or 2001.

Sigh ........................

To further clarify

I too take the dead films seriously, but only in a sense that they're like an RPG. I never personally played any RPG's but I look at dead films like the ultimate Fanstasy nightmare scenario; that and my fascination with end times stories.

Apacalyptic tales spark my imagination, the what ifs ...

And personally, I find the DEAD genre the best of the horror bunch.

[bassman]

Yeah...Romero's films are horror. But he turns the horror into common things that everyone does/sees/uses. The zombies aren't the only horror aspect to his films. In fact, they're the least horrifying aspect of his films.

The real horror is human reactions and relations.

And to say that the social commentary is accidental is....well....you must be blind.:p

And on a side note...I voted for Dawn04 because it's the only one i've seen and as stated before, I've heard that NOTLD3D doesn't try to take itself seriously like Dawn04 does. I doubt I'll ever see NOTLD3D, anyway...

I don't see that many dead films outside of Romero's so the only two that come to mind that are the worst are Return of the Living Dead and Dawn04. Dawn04 has it's merits in the action department but lacks in everything else. Even though ROTLD doesn't take itself seriously, it still makes me throw up in my mouth alittle.

[Dead Hoosier]

I swear to god

The credibility of the members of this forum sometimes amuses me

Disliking DAWN 04 over NIGHT 3D ?

There are more UNDEAD DUDS on this circuit than gems and DAWN 04 is a rarity; popcorn perhaps and not too be taken with any seriousness, but then again, who takes DAWN 78 or any other good dead film seriously ?

:annoyed: :annoyed: :annoyed:

NO KIDDING. They obviously don't actually believe it, they just seem to have some axe to grind...even after four years.
Dawn 04 is the best zombie film outside of Romero's own work...PERIOD.

[Doc]

And to say that the social commentary is accidental is....well....you must be blind.:p

No Night was accidental and I even heard him saying Dawn was accidental too, but now he is saying he meant it all......So which is it? Was it all unintentional or not?




Dawn 04 is the best zombie film outside of Romero's own work...PERIOD.

:lol: The best outside Romero's work? Hardly:rolleyes: Its the best remake of the dead remakes and better than most zed films, but the best zed film besides Romero?

[bassman]

NO KIDDING. They obviously don't actually believe it, they just seem to have some axe to grind...even after four years.
Dawn 04 is the best zombie film outside of Romero's own work...PERIOD.

ORRRR....wait for it....here it comes...you ready?.....EVERYONE HAS THEIR OWN OPINION!?!?!?

*GASP* NO! Blasphamy! It couldn't be!:eek:

:rolleyes:

Doc - I've never heard him say it was accidental. Not to say that it wasn't accidental, but I've never heard it. If it was......that's got to be one of the biggest coincidences I've ever seen in my life. Especially for 5 times in a row.

[capncnut]

Dawn 04 is the best zombie film outside of Romero's own work...PERIOD.
Looks like we got a prankster in the house. You are kidding, right?

[clanglee]

I have to say, It's unfair to vote on this poll unless you've seen both films. Personally, I voted for Night 3D. I simply refuse to believe that given a choice, anyone that has seen both movies would pick night3d over dawn04. anyone that does is meant for the loony farm henceforth.:hyper:

[MinionZombie]

Clanglee, well in your world I'd be in the loony bin, because I've seen both and both are gash, but because Yawn04 thinks it's so great (meanwhile you can just tell nobody making Night3D was expecting glory) makes it the worse film.

All that money, and yet the script is still a fetid pile of vomit.

As for the social commentary thing, Romero has stated many times that Dawn was all about consumerism and he'd been thinking about it a lot, what with his mate's setting up the Monroville Mall (featured in "Zack & Miri Make A Porno", the new Kevin Smith flick, by the way) - Dawn is all about the birth of mass-consumer culture.

As for Night, Romero himself has stated that major influences to the style and tone of the film were the civil rights movement, the Vietnam war and the 60's revolution, and ultimate failure there-of.

*sniffs*

Smells like intentional social commentary to me...and perhaps he's speaking more about the making of his earliers films now because they didn't have DVD until recently, and elaborate making of's were few and far between.

But still, even in Document of the Dead - filmed on set during Dawn's production - Romero states his case for Dawn's commentary.

[DjfunkmasterG]

I agree with some posters here...

If you voted for DAWN 04 you are doing it out of spite, and nothing more. Anyone moron with the IQ of an Apple can see that Dawn 04 is wayyyyyyy better than Night 3D.

The simple fact 5 people voted for Dawn 04, makes me lose a lot of faith in what those people consider entertaining films. If they really believe that Night 3d is better than Dawn 04, than I would never take a movie suggestion from them seriously.

:rolleyes::annoyed:


Edit:

MZ, I am totally shocked that you chose DAWN 04 over Night 3d. I mean, as a filmmaker yourself you can clearly see that DAWN 04 is the much better film in terms of production, story and realism, whereas Night 3d just didn't even try. You cry that DAWN 04 name rapes... HA! Night 3D not only name rapes with a 3D add on, it ****s upon and tarnishes any credibility the original film has by using the same name, whereas Dawn 04 opened a whole new world to zombie film fans. During the DAWN 04 theatrical release the single Disc Anchor Bay release of the original DAWN was ranked in the top 20 sales at FYE and AMAZON... At no other time has DAWN 1978 achieved that kind of status on DVD.

Infact to all the members who voted Dawn 04, you should be ashamed of yourselves, because at least Zack Snyder didn't squander his budget using ****ty actors and poor production values with corny references to the original film. The single biggest insult to Night in Night 3D was the use of the Cell Phone and text message (Coming 4 U Barb), the un-needed sexual scene and turning the Coopers into weed dealing hillbilly's living in the middle of nowhere.

At least DAWN 04 tried to bring us some real life people and place them into a surreal situation. The use of nudity and sex in DAWN 04 was at least justififed in how people pass the time for the 32 days they were stuck in the mall, they didn't have corny scenes with someone passing a joint to someone else as their magic 3D trick for the whole movie. Dawn 04 had more realism in its story and depiction than Night 3D could slap into a trailer.

Stupidity votes like that sometimes show the immaturity some HPotD members have over the stupidest things. I am sure the original poster wanted to know honest opinions based on both films story and technical merits, but you people instead chose to use this poll to stick the knife in a little deeper to the DAWN 04 crew. However, just remember who is laughing his way to success and who is stuck probably directing shoppers at wal-mart.

[MinionZombie]

*ahem*

Title of poll:


Which you dislike more?

Obviously Yawn04 has the better production value ... but I cannot agree that the script is any good. I think it's poorly written, the characters are mostly rubbish, they make so many retarded decisions and ugh...I just don't like the film at all...

Pearl Harbour had superb production value ... :D

You might say I ... what's the word? Dislike the film ... now if only there was a poll where I could register my dislike of Yawn04 ... oh wait a minute! :p:lol:

Just ribbing ya Deej. :)

But seriously, that's the poll - which do you dislike more - and I dislike Yawn04 more, one of the many reasons is because Yawn04 is trying to be good, while Night3D is just gash and it knows it. It's hard to explain, but shockingly, people have opinions.

It's as if Night3D barely registers, it barely exists ... kinda like Craptagium. It's shunned from the dimmest of tiny spotlights with a smattering of weak-arsed "pfft" sounds from about 3 people who bothered to turn up.

Yawn04 meanwhile is standing in a massive and bright spotlight, wiggling it's man-thong clad cock in everybody's face.

Heck, I've come to terms that some people rabidly dislike Land of the Dead ... I still can't get my head around it, but I've left it alone now, I'm leaving it be (or as best as I can).

Now, it'd be interesting if there was an option for "dislike both Yawn04/Night3D".

[bassman]

Infact to all the members who voted Dawn 04, you should be ashamed of yourselves, because at least Zack Snyder didn't squander his budget using ****ty actors and poor production values with corny references to the original film.

There's like.....one good actor in the flick. Well...let me rephrase that. I guess all the characters suck so badly that the actors couldn't save it. And as far as references go....there was a total of what....3 references to the original film? The Mall, Gaylen Ross Store, and the cameos from the original? That's it.



At least DAWN 04 tried to bring us some real life people and place them into a surreal situation. The use of nudity and sex in DAWN 04 was at least justififed in how people pass the time for the 32 days they were stuck in the mall, they didn't have corny scenes with someone passing a joint to someone else as their magic 3D trick for the whole movie. Dawn 04 had more realism in its story and depiction than Night 3D could slap into a trailer.

You answered your own question, dude. Dawn04 tried to take itself seriously when it's far from it. It's got some okay action....everything else is missing.



Stupidity votes like that sometimes show the immaturity some HPotD members have over the stupidest things.

And long-winded responses from someone who just can't possibly accept the fact that not everyone's opinion matches is own isn't immature?:rockbrow:


I am sure the original poster wanted to know honest opinions based on both films story and technical merits, but you people instead chose to use this poll to stick the knife in a little deeper to the DAWN 04 crew. However, just remember who is laughing his way to success and who is stuck probably directing shoppers at wal-mart.

I definitely wasn't trying to hurt anyones fragile feelings. Hell, I've kinda been defending Dawn04 lately because of it's action. Sadly...that's the only part that can be defended.


I've watched a bit of it now and Night3D is definitely meant as a dumb romp. I mean....it's got Sig Haig! With the exception Devil's Rejects, how many serious films does he churn out these days?:p The flick is trying to be a dumb flick. That's not to say that it's good....but at least it knows what it is.

[SRP76]

I feel so left out....I can't really vote, since I have always been spared the (supposed) horrors of seeing Night3D.

[clanglee]

Clanglee, well in your world I'd be in the loony bin, because I've seen both and both are gash, but because Yawn04 thinks it's so great (meanwhile you can just tell nobody making Night3D was expecting glory) makes it the worse film.

.

You are already in the loony bin in my world MZ. ;):p

I have to ask, what is the glory of which you speak. People make movies for money, for artistic reasons, even for fame. However, glory? Never woulda thunk that one.

Night 3D sucked pretty badly. I have defended it a bit on other threads, mostly because I sometimes enjoy bad zombie movies. Hell, most zombie movies are "bad" zombie movies. But to say that Dawn04 sucked worse than Night 3D is sheer lunacy. Its like saying "I like canned chicken flavored dog food better than chicken parmesan because that stupid chicken parmesan thinks it's all high falootin' and better than regular old chicken." Umm. . .I'm hungry now. Gotta go. :D

[Doc]

There's like.....one good actor in the flick. Well...let me rephrase that. I guess all the characters suck so badly that the actors couldn't save it. And as far as references go....there was a total of what....3 references to the original film? The Mall, Gaylen Ross Store, and the cameos from the original? That's it.




Don't forget a pregnant woman.

Also I think you Dawn fanatics are lucky.....I mean the original Dawn got something most classics didn't get......A GOOD REMAKE! Seriously you can hate the film, but you can't say it was the worst remake ever!





Doc - I've never heard him say it was accidental. Not to say that it wasn't accidental, but I've never heard it. If it was......that's got to be one of the biggest coincidences I've ever seen in my life. Especially for 5 times in a row.

I never said all of his other films social commentary was unintentional just Night's and Dawn's.....especially Night's.....I mean geez I heard him once in commentary say Night was all unintentional, but now I hear him say it was all intentional....So which is it George? Can't be both.:rolleyes:

[AcesandEights]

No surprises in the responses I'm seeing. Death, taxes and MZ and Bassman hating Dawn 04, these are the certainties that rule our world.

[clanglee]

No surprises in the responses I'm seeing. Death, taxes and MZ and Bassman hating Dawn 04, these are the certainties that rule our world.

:lol::lol::lol:

"It's funny 'cause it's true."

[DjfunkmasterG]

Whether they hate it or not, to saay they dislike it more that Night 3D is just bollocks. Seriously, there is no ****ing way anyone can like Night 3d more than Dawn 04. Night 3D does more name raping than Dawn 04 will ever do.

Those guys saying Night 3d is better than Dawn 04 is just BS in my honest opinion.

Wanna compare bad films compare Night 3D to Land of the Dead, and this is the one and only time I would vote Land being the better film.

[clanglee]

I dunno, I'm not a Land fan (as I'm sure we all know) but Land is better than MANY other zombie movies. Dawn04 is not one of them(IMHO), but Night3D sure as hell is.

[Trin]

Regarding accidental vs. intentional commentary.

As a follower of Romero's work for many, many years I've witnessed his story change over time, especially with the release of the recent films. It used to be that when interviewers would ask him about social commentary he'd wave his hands and tell them to stop reading so much into it. Nowadays he'll talk about it at length and it all sounds very planned. I don't know which is the truer account.

Romero has always said that his films are a reflection of the times. If I had to guess I'd say that he created the characters and events in Night & Dawn without a specific agenda of social commentary. However, his keen insights into the people and events around him made the characters such a good reflection of the times that in retrospect it is very easy to contend that the commentary was planned.

In contrast, it has been put forth many times that Romero didn't put as much social commentary into Day as he did with Night & Dawn. I believe he stuck to the same formula with Day, but it simply didn't tap into the general consensus of the times so well, so it isn't as easy to assign commentary in retrospect.

And for my final blasphemous remark, I also believe that Land was a departure from his previous style. In Land he preconceived the social commentary (likely because there was so much pressure for it to be there) rather than conceiving of the events and characters and letting them reflect the times. And because of that it seemed forced.

[capncnut]

Those guys saying Night 3d is better than Dawn 04 is just BS in my honest opinion.
Sounds like the rantings of a Yawn 04 fanboy to me...

[Dead Hoosier]

We are all entitled to our opinons...but those dudes assailing Dawn 04 and praising Land to no end are...zombies -- pure, motorized, mindless, clueless instinct. It's because of people like them that we in the US have had to endure 8 years of GW Bush.

[clanglee]

Regarding accidental vs. intentional commentary.

As a follower of Romero's work for many, many years I've witnessed his story change over time, especially with the release of the recent films. It used to be that when interviewers would ask him about social commentary he'd wave his hands and tell them to stop reading so much into it. Nowadays he'll talk about it at length and it all sounds very planned. I don't know which is the truer account.

Romero has always said that his films are a reflection of the times. If I had to guess I'd say that he created the characters and events in Night & Dawn without a specific agenda of social commentary. However, his keen insights into the people and events around him made the characters such a good reflection of the times that in retrospect it is very easy to contend that the commentary was planned.

In contrast, it has been put forth many times that Romero didn't put as much social commentary into Day as he did with Night & Dawn. I believe he stuck to the same formula with Day, but it simply didn't tap into the general consensus of the times so well, so it isn't as easy to assign commentary in retrospect.

And for my final blasphemous remark, I also believe that Land was a departure from his previous style. In Land he preconceived the social commentary (likely because there was so much pressure for it to be there) rather than conceiving of the events and characters and letting them reflect the times. And because of that it seemed forced.

Trin, once again. I agree spot on with ya. :D

[MinionZombie]

I'm staggered by the fact that people can't accept that *gasps in terror* some people have alternate opinions to theirs. My God!!! :eek:

That's no good at all, we'd better round up all the Yawn-Haters and throw them in a concentration camp, eh? :lol:

Comments regarding stubborn-ness ... *ahem* pot ... kettle ... black? :p

While I don't agree with Land haters regarding Land, and evidently don't agree with '04 lovers regarding '04 ... but knowing it's all a matter of opinion, while I remain in disagreement, I fully understand that aspect and accept it.

OPINION - OPINION - OPINION!!!! JESUS-F*CKING-CHRIST!!!! :eek::eek::eek:

*goes Postal*

Waaaaaaggggghhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!! :dead:

F*ck sake...:rolleyes:

[Doc]

Sounds like the rantings of a Yawn 04 fanboy to me... :lol: Didn't know there would even be such a thing!


Also where are you all getting this "Yawn '04 is taking itself serious"......is there some page where Zack Snyder saying he created the best zed film ever? A link would be nice.

[MinionZombie]

Serious as in all those involved in Yawn04 were attempting their best and considered themselves part of something great - to them at least.

Whereas with Night3D not once do you ever get the sense that anybody involved could have seriously thought the film would be any good - at least they were most likely aware of that fact!

And yes, this assertion only goes so far as my side of the argument (and the side on which several others reside), but that's merely answering your question, so don't even bother bitching about it.

Once again I'll point a massive, comedy-size index finger at the title of the poll:

Which do YOU dislike more. :p:moon::sneaky:

[Trin]

Trin, once again. I agree spot on with ya. :DProof that gread minds think alike...

... and so do ours!!! :lol:

I totally blew off Night 3D along with all the other Night remakes. Of the ones I've seen I didn't get too excited over any of them. Now I feel like I need to go rent the various Night remakes just to be up to speed.

I did not like Dawn '04 - let me be very clear on that - but I believe it was a cut above the masses of non-GAR zombie horror. It was a serious attempt and had many successful aspects. I think the Dawn-04 haters biggest complaint seems to be that it is compared favorably to Land. My opinion is that I dislike Land far more than Dawn'04, but I find them to be about equal in terms of which movie is better.

[Mutineer]

Whether they hate it or not, to saay they dislike it more that Night 3D is just bollocks. Seriously, there is no ****ing way anyone can like Night 3d more than Dawn 04. Night 3D does more name raping than Dawn 04 will ever do.

Those guys saying Night 3d is better than Dawn 04 is just BS in my honest opinion.

Wanna compare bad films compare Night 3D to Land of the Dead, and this is the one and only time I would vote Land being the better film.

Well said DJ

(Golf clap) :p:cool:

[jdog]

night of the living dead 3-d is horrible at least the dawn re-make was watchable.

[clanglee]

Serious as in all those involved in Yawn04 were attempting their best and considered themselves part of something great - to them at least.

Whereas with Night3D not once do you ever get the sense that anybody involved could have seriously thought the film would be any good - at least they were most likely aware of that fact!

And yes, this assertion only goes so far as my side of the argument (and the side on which several others reside), but that's merely answering your question, so don't even bother bitching about it.

Once again I'll point a massive, comedy-size index finger at the title of the poll:

Which do YOU dislike more. :p:moon::sneaky:

So Minion, in your personal opinion, If you're making a movie and you don't give a crap about it or how it turns out or even put much effort into making it good, It is gonna turn out better than a movie that makes an attempt at being good. I'm sorry man, but that makes very little sense.

I respect your opinion man, I just don't trust your judgement.:D

[Doc]

OPINION - OPINION - OPINION!!!! JESUS-F*CKING-CHRIST!!!! :eek::eek::eek:

*goes Postal*

Waaaaaaggggghhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!! :dead:

F*ck sake...:rolleyes: Your right Mr. MZ! Just like its my opinion I think that the original Dawn is a vastly overrated film and Land of the Dead is a stinker.:D

[Mutineer]

You mean Bland of the Dead. :lol: :moon:

[MinionZombie]

*comic book narrator voice*

And so...the title of the poll continues to be ignored...:lol::p

[capncnut]

*comic book narrator voice*

And so...the title of the poll continues to be ignored...:lol::p
LOL, might as well rename it 'what film does y'all like bitching about the most?' :D

[Trin]

The title of the poll is fine. People are just inserting write-in votes because the offered candidates are not satisfactory. :p

[Mutineer]

LOL

The Dawn04 / Land debate is better than MAC / PC !:lol: :stunned:

[bassman]

LOL

The Dawn04 / Land debate is better than MAC / PC !:lol: :stunned:


You're not lying. If Romero were to release four more dead movies, there would still somehow be a thread in here that brings back the Dawn04/Land debate. It will never die.:annoyed:

[acealive1]

night 3D since the film makers are using the immenent domain crap

[AcesandEights]

You mean Bland of the Dead. :lol: :moon:

Oh, snap! :stunned:

[clanglee]

Yeah, finally our own insult!! :hyper: take that. . .um. . people who say Yawn instead of Dawn. . because. um. . they are big meanies and all . . . . yeah. . .i wish we had had that in the old debate threads. . . seems a bit late now. But I for one am using it. Land is officially dubbed Bland!!

[bassman]

Yeah, finally our own insult!! :hyper: take that. . .um. . people who say Yawn instead of Dawn. . because. um. . they are big meanies and all . . . . yeah. . .i wish we had had that in the old debate threads. . . seems a bit late now. But I for one am using it. Land is officially dubbed Bland!!

The people that dislike the film have been using "bland" ever since the movie was released.:confused:

[ZombiePrototype]

I picked NOTLD 3D because thought it was really really bad, and even though some people might consider the following statement blasphemy I actually liked Dawn 04 and Land, did I love them NO but did I like them YES

[clanglee]

The people that dislike the film have been using "bland" ever since the movie was released.:confused:

I had no Idea. It's brand new to me, and I love it. :D

[Legion2213]

I had no Idea. It's brand new to me, and I love it. :D

I've just started using Bland of the Dead myself....but to be brutaly honest, I would prefer it if we gave Dawn 04 & Land their official titles.

We know certain folks dislike certain films...but let's use our energy to abuse a film that we ALL rightfully hate and think should be burned....one I've decided to call "Ghey of the Bud". :D

[tomfunker]

i was able to see the preview copy of "day of the dead". aside from a few names from the original, it was nothing even close to the original.
zombies that can cling to walls and jump long distances with amazing spider zombie powers? i dont think so. also as soon as they turn dead ,their eyes turn white and the get instantly ugly and all messed up looking....
i dont think so.
at best this is a generic dead movie.
it is not a remake. its that bad of a movie.it doesnt even deserve to use the title.
i watched once.i will not watch it on the big screen and i will not watch it on DVD at home.
dont waste your time on this one.
thank you .