mista_mo
29-Feb-2008, 05:12 PM
Allright,
Since I keep hearing (or rather seeing) threads and statements regarding why crude oil prices have risen, I was wondering which ones are actually the reason why, or is it a combination of reasons?
Why do people assume it was Bushes fault for oil prices rising? 8 years is a long time, and with oil reserves running low, and demand constantly rising, isn't it feasable to assume that oil is rising in price because the demand for it overcedes the current supply/pumping capacity? 8 years may not seem very long, but in that time....
United States
2000 census- 281,421,906
2008 estimate- 303,453,000
increase of roughly- 22,031,094 people
Canada
2006 census- 31,612,897 people
2008 estimate- 33,195,000 people
Increase of roughly- 1,582,103 people
(assuming roughly same birth/death rate, the population in 2000 was approximately 26,866,588 people (33,195,000 - 6,328,412) giving a population increase of about 6,328,412 people)
UK
2006 estimate- 60,587,300
2001 census- 58,789,194
increase of roughly 1,798,106 over a 5 year period
so, assuming birth/death rate is the same, the population in 2008 would approximately be 359,621.2 x 3= 1078863.6 + 60,587,300= 61,666,163.6 people.
Conversly, the population in 2000 would be approximately 58,429,572.8
*is this figure right? it can't be, how can the population growth be so relitively small?*
So, here we have 3 countries, each of which is showing an increae in population, each oh which is going to require more power to keep it's people prosperous.
thats all in 8 years.
Recap:
United States- 22,031,094
Canada- 6,328,412
UK- 3,236,590.8
so, if my math is right (bear with me, math was never my strongest subject), that means that in the 8 years bush has been in office, 31,596,096.8 people were born in Canada, United States, and United Kingdom.
Oil consumption (circa 2006) for these 3 countries was:
United States- 20,588
Canada- 2,218
United Kingdom- 1,816
*10 to the power 3 BBL/day, where BBL is a standard 42 gallon oil drum*
In 2005 production/consumption of oil is apprixmately 84 million barrels daily, with prices averaging about 60-67 dollers a barrel.
In 2008, prices are expected to average about 87 dollers, with a high of 95 dollers in january.
Is it not feasable, that with the population growth of the world (I know, I only selected 3 countries, but you get my example),and violence in many oil producing countries (NOT just Iraq), That prices would rise? Where does Bush fall in this? How can he be blamed for destabalising the oil market if he really only affectd 3 oil producing states?
Please, someone explain to me. I'm not doing this to try and give off the immpression of knowledge, or intelligence, I'm trying to get an idea why oil is at its current price, and the reasosn behind it.
Since I keep hearing (or rather seeing) threads and statements regarding why crude oil prices have risen, I was wondering which ones are actually the reason why, or is it a combination of reasons?
Why do people assume it was Bushes fault for oil prices rising? 8 years is a long time, and with oil reserves running low, and demand constantly rising, isn't it feasable to assume that oil is rising in price because the demand for it overcedes the current supply/pumping capacity? 8 years may not seem very long, but in that time....
United States
2000 census- 281,421,906
2008 estimate- 303,453,000
increase of roughly- 22,031,094 people
Canada
2006 census- 31,612,897 people
2008 estimate- 33,195,000 people
Increase of roughly- 1,582,103 people
(assuming roughly same birth/death rate, the population in 2000 was approximately 26,866,588 people (33,195,000 - 6,328,412) giving a population increase of about 6,328,412 people)
UK
2006 estimate- 60,587,300
2001 census- 58,789,194
increase of roughly 1,798,106 over a 5 year period
so, assuming birth/death rate is the same, the population in 2008 would approximately be 359,621.2 x 3= 1078863.6 + 60,587,300= 61,666,163.6 people.
Conversly, the population in 2000 would be approximately 58,429,572.8
*is this figure right? it can't be, how can the population growth be so relitively small?*
So, here we have 3 countries, each of which is showing an increae in population, each oh which is going to require more power to keep it's people prosperous.
thats all in 8 years.
Recap:
United States- 22,031,094
Canada- 6,328,412
UK- 3,236,590.8
so, if my math is right (bear with me, math was never my strongest subject), that means that in the 8 years bush has been in office, 31,596,096.8 people were born in Canada, United States, and United Kingdom.
Oil consumption (circa 2006) for these 3 countries was:
United States- 20,588
Canada- 2,218
United Kingdom- 1,816
*10 to the power 3 BBL/day, where BBL is a standard 42 gallon oil drum*
In 2005 production/consumption of oil is apprixmately 84 million barrels daily, with prices averaging about 60-67 dollers a barrel.
In 2008, prices are expected to average about 87 dollers, with a high of 95 dollers in january.
Is it not feasable, that with the population growth of the world (I know, I only selected 3 countries, but you get my example),and violence in many oil producing countries (NOT just Iraq), That prices would rise? Where does Bush fall in this? How can he be blamed for destabalising the oil market if he really only affectd 3 oil producing states?
Please, someone explain to me. I'm not doing this to try and give off the immpression of knowledge, or intelligence, I'm trying to get an idea why oil is at its current price, and the reasosn behind it.