Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Pig fever makes martial law a possibility.

  1. #1
    Dead Purge's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    541
    Undisclosed

    Angry Pig fever makes martial law a possibility.

    http://www.infowars.com/swine-flu-martial-law-bill-clears-massachusetts-senate/

    And my state is the first to fold--what a shock!

    Anyone who enters my home without permission probably won't walk out.

  2. #2
    pissing in your Kool-Aid DjfunkmasterG's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Deadlands, USA
    Age
    53
    Posts
    7,663
    United States
    Link bad
    ALWAYS BET ON DEAD!
    Official member of the "ZOMBIE MAN" Fan Club Est. 2007 *FOUNDING MEMBER*

  3. #3
    Rising kortick's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Lampshade Leather Bar
    Posts
    1,059
    United States
    I was wrong.
    SO wrong.

    Swine Fever is a GOOD thing.

    (oh BTW, Nice perverted fruit sig)

    Last edited by kortick; 30-Apr-2009 at 02:19 AM.

  4. #4
    Twitching strayrider's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    699
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Purge View Post
    http://www.infowars.com/swine-flu-martial-law-bill-clears-massachusetts-senate/

    And my state is the first to fold--what a shock!

    Anyone who enters my home without permission probably won't walk out.
    http://news.bostonherald.com/news/po...flu_prep_bill/

    Intrusive perhaps. In violation of the 4th Amendment possibly. Martial Law, not even close.

    What I expect is for President Grin to http://federaltimes.com/index.php?S=4062635 spend, spend, spend like there is no tomorrow.




    Why not just seal the border until the crisis passes?

    http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cf...s-000003106282
    "Schuchat suggested it would not be effective to try to close or partially close the border based on analysis with infectious disease modeling that has been done.

    “The estimates were that if there were cases in Canada or Mexico, within days, the ability to stop that introduction into the United States would be gone,” Schuchat said."


    While it is no longer a possibility to "stop the introduction", couldn't we stem the flow of potentially infected persons and thus lessen the possibility of a pandemic? Heck, this might even solve some other problems we're having "on the border". (yeah, I know this song is about the Basque rebellion, just change the lyrics from "fishing boats" to "pick-up trucks" and you get the idea)


    This guy sings like a pantywaist.

    Quote Originally Posted by kortick View Post




    -stray-

  5. #5
    Twitching
    Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,114
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by Purge View Post
    And my state is the first to fold--what a shock!
    Any relation to the the fact that your state also seems to have trouble with basic fractions?
    "We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat. They do not exist." - Queen Victoria

  6. #6
    Dead Skippy911sc's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    S. IL
    Age
    52
    Posts
    750
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by Publius View Post
    Any relation to the the fact that your state also seems to have trouble with basic fractions?

  7. #7
    Walking Dead SRP76's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,826
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by strayrider View Post
    [
    "Schuchat suggested it would not be effective to try to close or partially close the border based on analysis with infectious disease modeling that has been done.

    “The estimates were that if there were cases in Canada or Mexico, within days, the ability to stop that introduction into the United States would be gone,” Schuchat said."


    While it is no longer a possibility to "stop the introduction", couldn't we stem the flow of potentially infected persons and thus lessen the possibility of a pandemic?
    People don't want to think that way. Put it in living dead terms:

    "If one zombie gets into the building, we may as well throw open the doors and let a whole mob in".

    Makes as much sense as a football bat, but that's the way they see it.

  8. #8
    Dead LoSTBoY's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Scotch Land
    Age
    42
    Posts
    567
    Scotland
    So this is how we go out....

    Not with a whimper but a squeal.

  9. #9
    Just Married AcesandEights's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mid-Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    7,479
    United States


    No pig ain't neva gonna hold me down!

    That's a double entendre, brothas.

    "Men choose as their prophets those who tell them that their hopes are true." --Lord Dunsany

  10. #10
    has the velocity Mike70's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,549
    Canada
    while i don't think that H1N1 (the actual designation of the so-called swine flu) is going to cause the death that the 18-19 outbreak did, i can conceive of a worldwide pandemic of some virulent disease strain. in that case, liberal as i am, i have no problem with some rather draconian restrictions. one of the rights that none of us enjoy is the right to make someone else sick. this is why whenever i hear of some asshole bragging about how they go to work sick, i always think "what a fucking dick!" nobody wants your damn germs, stay your ass at home, that's what sick days are for.
    Last edited by Mike70; 02-May-2009 at 02:21 AM.
    "The bumps you feel are asteroids smashing into the hull."

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •