No Dawn of the Dead Sequel??

[Tri0xin]

I just hope the Day of the Dead remake is as good as Dawn '04. Dawn '04 and Return of the Living Dead are the two best non-Romero zombie movies in existence, I think. As much as I am against the Day remake, I still hope it's as entertaining as Dawn '04 was and is.

[DjfunkmasterG]

Don't get your hopes up. Taurus Entertainment, the people behind DAY of the DEAD 2, are producing this. I smell crap fest.

[EvilNed]

At least this one has some budgets, and a director familiar with the horror genre. I hope they do a re-imagination, ala Dawn of the Dead remake. Basicly, I want another zombie film.

[MinionZombie]

Hear ye, hear ye, "Day of the Remake" will suck copious amounts of man-shaft. I have forseen this in a premonition...

[erisi236]

Hear ye, hear ye, "Day of the Remake" will suck copious amounts of man-shaft. I have forseen this in a premonition... I too have felt a disturbance in the Force

[DjfunkmasterG]

I too have felt a disturbance in the Force AWESOME Quote

[DjfunkmasterG]

I've loosened up alot on Dawn 04, but I still don't like it. It stole the name and manipulated what Dawn of the Dead is, just for money. Just my opinion. Even though it is your opinion allow me to retort. Everyone, thinks what DAWN of the DEAD is, is what Romero brought to the horror genre. That is not the sole reason of DAWN of the DEAD or the meaning. Even though both films share the same title each can have a different meaning. Romero's DAWN was about the DAWN of a new society in the wake of a zombie apocalypse. Snyder's DAWN was about the rising of the dead. DAWN has many meanings and the remake just explored it from the more literal meaning. A more in your face approach. Whereas Romero did it with more depth and exploration. So one film cannot rip off the other because they are completely different.

[bassman]

Even though it is your opinion allow me to retort. Everyone, thinks what DAWN of the DEAD is, is what Romero brought to the horror genre. That is not the sole reason of DAWN of the DEAD or the meaning. Even though both films share the same title each can have a different meaning. Romero's DAWN was about the DAWN of a new society in the wake of a zombie apocalypse. Snyder's DAWN was about the rising of the dead. DAWN has many meanings and the remake just explored it from the more literal meaning. A more in your face approach. Whereas Romero did it with more depth and exploration. So one film cannot rip off the other because they are completely different. But there is one major difference, regardless of name and story..... One of them is a good film and the other isn't ....

[Rottedfreak]

Look on the bright side without a sequal it leaves the film open to a expanded universe unlike a certain quadrology that has inconsistent zombies and chronology. It's rediculous Romero has a stab at the remake with "their meant to be dead and all messed up!" so explain to us how in Day and Land they manage to keep up with humans who run from them and where their strength to tear people apart came from George.

[Khardis]

Of course, because in today's world, a pompous child is a better writer than the man who created a modern version of a genre and has created countless hits. I mean, I'm not saying that people can't get rusty. But Land of the Dead's faults were just as overrated as the Dawn of the Dead remake's. People slammed Land of the Dead for Big Daddy. It wasn't Big Daddy that was bad, it was Eugene Clark's acting... But I'll shut up, before we get another debate. Thanks for posting this, interesting news. it might just be the difference of intention. I like dDawn 04 better than LOTD because Dawn04 was made to be a scary zombie movie. LOTD was written to be some social message wrapped very poorly in a film. It was kind of like disecting something with a spoon, and turned a lot of people off.