Dawn of the Dead 3D Bluray? Anyone watched it yet?

[Gryphon]

I dunno. My wife claims she can't see the HD and just recently had a visit with the optometrist. And obviously if I have it, she can afford it. Go figure. I agree with you that anyone SHOULD be able to tell the difference, but strangely I've had many claim they couldn't... Strange, hehe, but I'll take your word for it

[DEAD BEAT]

I dunno. My wife claims she can't see the HD and just recently had a visit with the optometrist. And obviously if I have it, she can afford it. Go figure. I agree with you that anyone SHOULD be able to tell the difference, but strangely I've had many claim they couldn't... Whow! Bass ur married? C this proves alone that were nothin like the Star Trek geeks! Lmao

[DjfunkmasterG]

A lot of people just don't like new things (or can't afford them), so they put them down. Anyone that can see clearly should be able to tell the difference between HD and SD. Hell, even with a movie as old as Dawn78. I had the DVD (admittedly not the director's cut), and now I have the Blu Ray. Heck, just the background detail alone is sharper... walls, rocks, the lettering on the chopper, the rednecks running around below the chopper before the "I'm a Man" scene, etc. If you can't see those things more sharply in HD, you need (better) glasses As for 3D... it's great in the Theatre, IMO... but I don't need it at home. HD is just fine for me Besides, without the 3D at home, I can pay attention to background details I missed in the 3D experience in the theatre These same knuckleheads buy the nice HD tV bbut refuse to spring for HD cable then overstretch the SD signal/picture to fil the screen and bitch there is no difference... there is, but there is NO cure for dumbassery

[Gryphon]

These same knuckleheads buy the nice HD tV bbut refuse to spring for HD cable then overstretch the SD signal/picture to fil the screen and bitch there is no difference... there is, but there is NO cure for dumbassery Sad, but true

[SymphonicX]

Same type of people ask "well I just don't understand how all these old movies are in HD, it wasn't invented when those movies were made!" I love 3D, its great in the home and it adds many new things to fantasy film making....shamefully though, it's being wasted on sports and opera.

[kidgloves]

Any more news on this?

[Neil]

Seems to have disappeared? I suspect Rubinstein has lost interest in it, and the sequel he also talked about?

[kidgloves]

Seems to have disappeared? I suspect Rubinstein has lost interest in it, and the sequel he also talked about? Shame. I've become quite a fan of the 2D conversions I've seen so far. Dawn in 3D would be yet another excuse to watch it again. The 3D definitely adds something IMHO.

[Neil]

Shame. I've become quite a fan of the 2D conversions I've seen so far. Dawn in 3D would be yet another excuse to watch it again. The 3D definitely adds something IMHO. This is at home? I've really not been bothered. For example, I have Avatar and I'd rather watch it in 2D than 3D.

[kidgloves]

This is at home? I've really not been bothered. For example, I have Avatar and I'd rather watch it in 2D than 3D. Yes. Its at home. I have the active 3D (the one that goes through the back of the tv and also pops out the front). It helps if you change the settings to suit the movie also, which I don't think a lot of people are aware of. Blows the cinema experience out of the water IMO.

[Neil]

Active 3D? Is that where you need "active glasses" rather than the passive cinema type? If so, that's what my Panasonic plasma has... I actually had a result buying my TV. After buying it they did a price match and refunded me £200... and then couldn't supply me with the two pairs of glasses that were suppose to come with it, so refunded me a futher 2 x £129 (they were changign £129 per set at the time). I've since bought one pair for £90 just to try it... But as I said... Not sold!