View Poll Results: Which Batman do you prefer?

Voters
32. You may not vote on this poll
  • Batman

    9 28.13%
  • Batman Begins

    23 71.88%
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 76

Thread: The Real Debate Batman (1989) or Batman Begins (2005)

  1. #1
    pissing in your Kool-Aid DjfunkmasterG's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Deadlands, USA
    Age
    53
    Posts
    7,663
    United States

    The Real Debate Batman (1989) or Batman Begins (2005)

    Which truly is the better film?

    Batman Begins gets my nod solely on the story and characters. The relationship of Bruce and His Dad, his conflict within to become Batman etc etc.


    Thoughts?


    I wish I had a poll Function. HEY MINION MAKE ME A POLL BATMAN or BATMAN BEGINS
    ALWAYS BET ON DEAD!
    Official member of the "ZOMBIE MAN" Fan Club Est. 2007 *FOUNDING MEMBER*

  2. #2
    Twitching Arcades057's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    is everything
    Age
    44
    Posts
    770
    United States
    Tough question, but I gotta go with the original. Micheal Keaton and Jack mothertruckin Nicholson are Gods.
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

  3. #3
    Survey Time axlish's Avatar
    ViP

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Paradise City, Florida
    Posts
    2,249
    United States
    I side with Batman Begins. It exceeded my expectations, I don't think I could have written it any better.

    We be pollin' now

  4. #4
    Just been bitten deadwrtr's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    170
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by DjfunkmasterG
    Which truly is the better film?

    Batman Begins gets my nod solely on the story and characters. The relationship of Bruce and His Dad, his conflict within to become Batman etc etc.


    Thoughts?
    Batman Begins gets my vote. While I liked Keaton and Nicholson, I found that Batman to be a bit too comic-bookish, whereas Batman Begins developed the ideology of Batman much better, especially his foray's into the criminal mind.

    Plus, Bale is the sh*t. Did you see him in The Machinist? Holy crap... what an actor.

  5. #5
    Dead erisi236's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Flavour country
    Age
    48
    Posts
    570
    United States
    gotta give the original some love


    "To further complicate, I will now state, that your convictions lack definition and form."

  6. #6
    certified super rad Danny's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    simply walking into mordor
    Age
    36
    Posts
    14,157
    UK
    the origional, batman begins sucked it was a prequel for christs sake!


  7. #7
    Dying glsjaw's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    western PA represent
    Posts
    196
    Undisclosed
    for petes sake Batman begins is so hollywood and not the true meaning of batman, (I.E.nice batmobile)
    its all about the Party.

  8. #8
    Banned Tri0xin's Avatar
    Banned User

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    On her ship, tied to the mast..
    Age
    48
    Posts
    125
    United States

    Thumbs up Marvin Gaye said it best...

    Ain't nothin' like the real thing, baby!

    Tim Burton's Batman. Michael, Kim, Jack... great cast.

  9. #9
    Just been bitten Hawkboy's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Surrey, BC
    Age
    53
    Posts
    134
    Canada
    I didn't think it was even up for debate with anyone (at least in Comic Book circles)... Batman Begins captures the feeling of the Comic much more than the Burton pic. As the Batman films progressed after Burtons they became less like the comic and more like the camp-fest TV series that really doesn't reflect the true comic Batman very well.

    My only complaint was that they should have ditched the Black suit and gone with something more like the comic.

  10. #10
    Team Rick MinionZombie's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    The Mandatorium
    Posts
    24,249
    UK
    Obviously you figured it out, so I'll sit back in my chair and vote for "Begins". While the original film is friggin' awesome, the new film's story, acting, character development etc is just fantastic. It felt so good to see a franchise that was dead in the water, twitching and dribbling, to be reborn with an excellent new film, and Bale rocked ... slightly daft "gruff Batman voice" aside.

  11. #11
    pissing in your Kool-Aid DjfunkmasterG's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Deadlands, USA
    Age
    53
    Posts
    7,663
    United States
    I always give props to the original especially because of Nicholson, but lets face facts BATMAN BEGINS was closer to the comic than BATMAN. Plus in BEGINS you get to see who realy killed Bruce Waynes parents. It wasn't the joker as the 1st film would have you believe, it was a homeless man on the streets of Gotham.

    For overall entertainment BEGINS delivers, BATMAN exceeds. For overall quality I have to go with BEGINS. For performances and story, again BEGINS gets my nod.
    ALWAYS BET ON DEAD!
    Official member of the "ZOMBIE MAN" Fan Club Est. 2007 *FOUNDING MEMBER*

  12. #12
    through another dimension bassman's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    15,229
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by hellsing
    the origional, batman begins sucked it was a prequel for christs sake!
    It's not a prequel. It has nothing to do with the old Burton/Shumacher franchise. In fact, the villian in the next film is supposed to be the Joker. So it's not a prequel....It's the beginning of a new franchise(which will start going downhill just like the last one did, i'm sure)


    It's hard to choose between the two. They're both great films. Overall, I think I would have to go with "Begins" because of the reasons everyone else have stated. "Begins" makes Wayne/Batman more human.

    I consider both about equal..

  13. #13
    pissing in your Kool-Aid DjfunkmasterG's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Deadlands, USA
    Age
    53
    Posts
    7,663
    United States
    It is, but it isn't a prequel.

    However, you are right it has S H I T to do with the Burton and Shuhacker films.
    ALWAYS BET ON DEAD!
    Official member of the "ZOMBIE MAN" Fan Club Est. 2007 *FOUNDING MEMBER*

  14. #14
    through another dimension bassman's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    15,229
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by DjfunkmasterG
    It is, but it isn't a prequel.
    What do you mean? "It is" what?

    One other thing I like about "Begins" is the awesome supporting cast. Sure, Burton's "Batman" had Nicholson, but "Begins" has Liam Neeson, Morgan Freeman, Michael Caine, Gary Oldman(who I think made a PERFECT Gordon), Tom Wilkinson, etc. Truly awesome cast.


    Hopefully this "Batman" film franchise can stay decent past the second film....
    Last edited by bassman; 17-May-2006 at 02:10 PM.

  15. #15
    Dead Tullaryx's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Land of Take-What-You-Want
    Age
    50
    Posts
    696
    United States
    This is a simple one for me: Batman Begins. I may be the few who actually didn't think the original Burton Batman was that great once I actually got past the novelty of a comic book movie finally being on the big screen.

    Burton's film really only had one thing going for it and that was Wayne Manor and the gothic feel of Gotham. Other than that all the characters were either overwritten caricatures of their comic version, and remember Burton was supposedly basing his film post-Miller Dark Knight Returns Batman in terms of attitude and feel. Keaton was all wrong to play both Batman and Bruce Wayne. Not once did I feel like Keaton as the Wayne persona was actually an indolent playboy who cared nothing but himself, or at least pretended not to have any sort of social agenda. And as Batman he didn't have the physicality to pull it off.

    Nicholson was a very good Joker, but again he seemed more like Nicholson pretending to be Joker instead of actually becoming the character. Really, Nicholson seemed like he was playing one of his past kookie characters but with clown make-up on. Don't even get me started on what Burton did to the character of Police Commissioner Gordon.

    Nolan's Batman Begins actually follows the concepts and ideas laid down in the comics. Nolan wasn't a slave to the canonical information from the comics, but he actually was able to capture the spirit, if not, the exact feel of them and at the same time keep the film based on reality. The supporting characters were very close to what was established in the comics, with special mention towards Miller's Year: One characterizations. Even the technology used by Batman were shown, described and explained to make them something that could be possible. As for Bale's voice for Batman, it's little-known outside of the comic-book geeks (which I am proud to call myself one) that Bruce Wayne changes his voice to be a menacing raspy sounding voice to be Batman's voice. That was a little detail in the film that made me smile. I knew then they wanted to do the definitive Batman film. As for the Batmobile...whatever reservations I had ended once I saw it in action and also realized that this is just Batman starting out, hence he still hasn't made too much modifications to make it look more like a Bat-themed vehicle.

    There's more to say, but for now those are what made Nolan's film better and really put Burton's film out into the open as something that really looks closer to the 60's camp TV series than to what Miller tried to do when he reinvented the Dark Knight.
    "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you."
    --- Batman

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •