Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: NIGHT 40Th Anniversary DVD Review

  1. #1
    Walking Dead DubiousComforts's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,969
    Undisclosed

    NIGHT 40Th Anniversary DVD Review

    The Good News:
    The image quality of the new Night of the Living Dead 40th anniversary DVD surpasses the previous reigning champ, Elite's Millennium edition. Though there may be some boosted contrast and edge enhancement to the new release, no doubt there is more prominent detail not present in earlier DVDs. The freeze framing issues of the Elite DVD which were caused by print damage have been eliminated, as well.

    40th


    Millennium


    40th


    Millennium


    The Bad News
    The new documentary. Where do I begin?

    More to come...
    Last edited by DubiousComforts; 22-May-2008 at 06:00 PM.

  2. #2
    Survey Time axlish's Avatar
    ViP

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Paradise City, Florida
    Posts
    2,249
    United States
    I loved the new documentary. It had flaws in the execution but it had new info and new interviews. What problem did you have with it in particular?

  3. #3
    Walking Dead DubiousComforts's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,969
    Undisclosed
    One For The Fire works as a very nice tribute to the film and the people that created it, but it is awful as a documentary. There is far too much back story about the events leading up to the film, but very little about the actual production. It's supposed to be a documentary about Night of the Living Dead, not The Latent Image.

    Some of the locations are visited, but they fail to demonstrate how or where anything was filmed. What happened to the farmhouse location? Great pains were taken to re-create the drive to the cemetery, yet they didn't bother to film the area of the opening scene even though it is located just a mile or so down the road from the cemetery. Very sloppy research.

    It's great that the documentary includes interviews with Rudy Ricci, Rege Survinski, Bill Cardille, Gary Streiner, Ella Mae Smith and George Kosana, but apparently no one was knowledgeable enough to ask the right questions. I learned more from talking with Ella Mae Smith for five minutes then from the entire documentary. They didn't even show which ghoul she had played, even though the footage that was cut to during her interview would have shown her if they had let it run for a few seconds longer. Very, very sloppy research. There are maybe a dozen other people who were involved with NIGHT that could have been interviewed as well, but were never contacted.

    The documentary extensively uses library music from the film, but doesn't bother to credit the composers. So what do you think--did they even obtain permission to use that music? Obviously, the tracks were pulled from the Varese Sarabande LP because the documentary contains the same error: a wrong cue credited for the "posse scene" is used over and over in the documentary even though it is never used in the film. Very, very, very sloppy research. (The credits at the end are a complete joke, as well, but that is another story.)

    I did enjoy the extended interview with Kyra, yet it was heartbreaking to see Karl Hardman, particularly how frail he had become by that time and when he became emotional over Duane Jones.

    Here's another thing: the DVD still gallery. There are some new and interesting photos included in the still gallery, but no caption or explanation of who or what you're actually looking at. Instead of cutting to footage from the film (which we've already seen a million times) why not use some of those photos during the documentary so there could be some further information from the interviewees?
    Last edited by DubiousComforts; 22-May-2008 at 05:02 PM.

  4. #4
    capncnut
    Guest
    Forget my earlier post, I had one too many last night.

    Quote Originally Posted by DubiousComforts View Post
    40th


    Millennium
    Okay, I CAN see the difference between the two images but hell, it's only a twinge sharper.

    Quote Originally Posted by DubiousComforts View Post
    It was heartbreaking to see Karl Hardman, particularly how frail he had become by that time and when he became emotional over Duane Jones.
    That is seriously tempting to me, as long as it isn't intrusive.
    Last edited by capncnut; 22-May-2008 at 05:52 PM.

  5. #5
    through another dimension bassman's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    15,229
    United States
    I was considering picking this up when I got Diary, but judging by this I'm glad that I didn't. Waste of money, imo.

  6. #6
    Walking Dead DubiousComforts's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,969
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by capncnut View Post
    Forget my earlier post, I had one too many last night.
    Hey, where'd that post go?

    Quote Originally Posted by capncnut View Post
    Okay, I CAN see the difference between the two images but hell, it's only a twinge sharper.
    Keep in mind that you're looking at raw source frames. Your DVD player (whether hardware or software) enhances the image so it will look different when watching the movie, usually with more contrast.

    Bottom line is that the new release is worth the $15 for the improved image quality of the film and the nice video tribute to the people that made the film, but it doesn't excuse the shoddy research behind the documentary.
    Last edited by DubiousComforts; 22-May-2008 at 06:03 PM.

  7. #7
    capncnut
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by DubiousComforts View Post
    Bottom line is that the new release is worth the $15 for the improved image quality of the film and the nice video tribute to the people that made the film, but it doesn't excuse the shoddy research behind the documentary.
    Strange really because the documentary was the most hyped thing on the whole DVD. I hope the new GAR documentary that's coming out later this year doesn't let anyone down in a similar fashion.

  8. #8
    Walking Dead DubiousComforts's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,969
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by capncnut View Post
    Strange really because the documentary was the most hyped thing on the whole DVD. I hope the new GAR documentary that's coming out later this year doesn't let anyone down in a similar fashion.
    I was interviewed for a Romero documentary (not sure if it's the same one you're talking about) at his convention appearance in Dallas... as though I know what I'm talking about.

  9. #9
    capncnut
    Guest

  10. #10
    Walking Dead DubiousComforts's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,969
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by capncnut View Post
    Nope, different one. Supposedly they are also documenting Romero's appearances on the NIGHT convention tour.

    I'll take a wild stab in the dark here and guess that the trouble with these documentaries is they are simply turning the cameramen loose to film whatever they can get. How much info could I have really said on the spur of the moment, yet they found it interesting enough to video?

  11. #11
    capncnut
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by DubiousComforts View Post
    I'll take a wild stab in the dark here and guess that the trouble with these documentaries is they are simply turning the cameramen loose to film whatever they can get. How much info could I have really said on the spur of the moment, yet they found it interesting enough to video?
    I dunno, you are rather knowledgeable about the subject. Plus it's always interesting to see various fan responses and opinions on the film. But I agree with you, these new documentaries are struggling to find new information and are trying to fit more into an already packed suitcase.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Banned User

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Age
    48
    Posts
    114
    Undisclosed
    The picture on the 40th anniversary looks a lot less muddy than the Millenium edition (which I wasn't very fond of). I did like the forward by Stephen King on the Millenium's liner though.

  13. #13
    Dying C5NOTLD's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    412
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by DubiousComforts View Post
    One For The Fire works as a very nice tribute to the film and the people that created it, but it is awful as a documentary. There is far too much back story about the events leading up to the film, but very little about the actual production. It's supposed to be a documentary about Night of the Living Dead, not The Latent Image.

    Some of the locations are visited, but they fail to demonstrate how or where anything was filmed. What happened to the farmhouse location? Great pains were taken to re-create the drive to the cemetery, yet they didn't bother to film the area of the opening scene even though it is located just a mile or so down the road from the cemetery. Very sloppy research.

    It's great that the documentary includes interviews with Rudy Ricci, Rege Survinski, Bill Cardille, Gary Streiner, Ella Mae Smith and George Kosana, but apparently no one was knowledgeable enough to ask the right questions. I learned more from talking with Ella Mae Smith for five minutes then from the entire documentary. They didn't even show which ghoul she had played, even though the footage that was cut to during her interview would have shown her if they had let it run for a few seconds longer. Very, very sloppy research. There are maybe a dozen other people who were involved with NIGHT that could have been interviewed as well, but were never contacted.

    The documentary extensively uses library music from the film, but doesn't bother to credit the composers. So what do you think--did they even obtain permission to use that music? Obviously, the tracks were pulled from the Varese Sarabande LP because the documentary contains the same error: a wrong cue credited for the "posse scene" is used over and over in the documentary even though it is never used in the film. Very, very, very sloppy research. (The credits at the end are a complete joke, as well, but that is another story.)

    I did enjoy the extended interview with Kyra, yet it was heartbreaking to see Karl Hardman, particularly how frail he had become by that time and when he became emotional over Duane Jones.

    Here's another thing: the DVD still gallery. There are some new and interesting photos included in the still gallery, but no caption or explanation of who or what you're actually looking at. Instead of cutting to footage from the film (which we've already seen a million times) why not use some of those photos during the documentary so there could be some further information from the interviewees?

    I agree.

    I wondered about the farmhouse location as well. They interviewed (hard to call it that since it was so short) Ella Mae Smith and then don't take any footage of the farmhouse location?

    I also don't understand taking the time to film in the basement location and then not doing any comparison pics (then/now). And why in God's name would you film in the basement (towards the stairs/power boxes on the walls) and not do a reverse shot showing where much of the action takes place (towards where the work bench etc was in the film). Instead with Russo and Streiner standing in front of the power boxes they go to a wider shot of the same wall without Russo/Streiner. huh?


    The only parts of it I enjoyed were the Romero interview (seeing some of the participants that had not been interviewed before, and the Kyra/Marilyn/Karl footage - very sad to see how Karl had become frail. But as usual he was a trooper to go on with the show - what a class act. Can't believe they couldn't come up with a better question than asking Marilyn Eastman about the makeup for the 1000th time. Streiner did have a funny story about a relative.

    I'm getting tired of seeing celebrities being interviewed about the impact of NOTLD. That's been done before. How about some of the others from NOTLD instead - heck they could have gave the time to George Kosana for some of his stories.

    Was that a interview with George Kosana as I blinked - (wow, it was short as were many interviews I felt).

    By the way how did Judith Odea get top billing over Duane Jones on the dvd case?
    Last edited by C5NOTLD; 23-May-2008 at 04:51 AM. Reason: spelling

  14. #14
    Walking Dead DubiousComforts's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,969
    Undisclosed
    Quote Originally Posted by C5NOTLD View Post
    I'm getting tired of seeing celebrities being interviewed about the impact of NOTLD. That's been done before. How about some of the others from NOTLD instead - heck they could have gave the time to George Kosana for some of his stories.
    Ha, which "celebrities"? Alice Cooper was the best they could get. The 25th anniversary documentary had famous genre filmmakers to talk about the impact of NIGHT on their own work. At least that is relevant.

    Quote Originally Posted by C5NOTLD View Post
    Was that a interview with George Kosana as I blinked - (wow, it was short as were many interviews I felt).
    George Kosana also had a few of his names/facts mixed up and nobody bothered to correct them. Isn't that what the director is for?

    Quote Originally Posted by C5NOTLD View Post
    By the way how did Judith Odea get top billing over Duane Jones on the dvd case?
    That's the least of the DVD cover's problems. Actually, I seldom recall Duane Jones being billed at all when NIGHT was broadcast on TV in the 70s. Believe it or not, the starring roles would be listed as "Judith O'Dea and Russell Streiner." I grew up thinking the character of Ben must have been played by Russell Streiner.
    Last edited by DubiousComforts; 23-May-2008 at 01:18 AM.

  15. #15
    capncnut
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by DubiousComforts View Post
    Ha, which "celebrities"? Alice Cooper was the best they could get. The 25th anniversary documentary had famous genre filmmakers to talk about the impact of NIGHT on their own work. At least that is relevant.
    What the f**k does Alice cooper have to do with NOTLD, you are joking? If that's the best they could get then this documentary is in sad shape.

    Quote Originally Posted by DubiousComforts View Post
    Actually, I seldom recall Duane Jones being billed at all when NIGHT was broadcast on TV in the 70s. Believe it or not, the starring roles would be listed as "Judith O'Dea and Russell Streiner." I grew up thinking the character of Ben must have been played by Russell Streiner.
    Dayom.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •