View Poll Results: Which is Your favourite type of zombie film

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • The Outbreak

    11 61.11%
  • The Aftermath

    7 38.89%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Whats your Favorite type of Zombie movie?

  1. #1
    Dying paranoid101's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Age
    53
    Posts
    487
    Great Britain

    Whats your Favorite type of Zombie movie?

    Watched a few zombie movies this past week and its got me Wondering, whats your favourite type of zombie movie?

    Is it set at the start of the outbreak, watching the world fall apart and seeing how can I say heroes of the film trying to survive the beginning of the infection, Like Night of the Living Dead, Return of the Living, Dawn of the dead 2004 etc

    Or is it set after the outbreak when everything has gone to shit and the heroes this time are surviving in the ruins, maybe having to fight other survivors or with themselves, like Day of the Dead, Dawn 78 (this film maybe could be class as an outbreak film still) and the 3rd and 4th Resident Evil films.

    So guys which is your favourite?
    Last edited by paranoid101; 08-Jul-2011 at 01:33 PM. Reason: spelling

  2. #2
    through another dimension bassman's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    15,229
    United States
    A little bit of both, actually. I guess if I had to choose it would be the Aftermath. Most of my favorites fall in that category.

    While I also enjoy watching as the world falls apart from the start, there's something special about being dropped into the aftermath with no bearings as to what went down. Take the opening to Day for example. The abandoned city that swells with the dead once Miguel makes his presence known? Now that's great stuff. The aftermath just seems like a much more hopeless scenario. Say what you will about Land, but I LOVED the opening aftermath credits. When the camera pans down from the 'EATS' sign and you see the dead wondering around as if they've been "living" that way for a long period of time. A great aftermath start to a film. Too bad the rest of the film didn't hold up as well.

    Another great example is The Walking Dead. That's a scenario we don't get to see played out too often. Experience the aftermath with the main character. It's one thing to start a movie like Day and experience the world as an audience member, but when you're also experiencing it for the first time with the protagonist it takes it to a whole other level. True, TWD went back and showed parts of the outbreak, but the pilot episode as you explore the world with Rick was just phenomenal.
    Last edited by bassman; 08-Jul-2011 at 01:58 PM. Reason: .

  3. #3
    Being Attacked glazedoverdead's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Under your bed
    Age
    51
    Posts
    53
    United States
    I totally agree with Bassman. I love both scenarios equally. I love how we start in the middle of the chaos in Day, but I really did enjoy the Hell out of the chaotic and rather explosive beginning in Dawn '04. I'm torn between which I love more...too hard to choose. I suppose it really depends on the movie in question. I think if its really well done, it doesn't matter as much to me where they start out... As long as the zombies rise up and take over the Earth!!!!
    Now, if you want to have a good time and you need some p@*$y...you can cut that chicken's head off...

  4. #4
    Banned
    Banned User

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,219
    United States
    I would have to go with... oatmeal.
    "Oatmeal, are you crazy?!" - Pinkamena Diane Pie
    Seriously though, I kind of like the whole after-the-whole-world's-gone-to-hell thing that some movies pull off really well.
    The chaos of an outbreak just doesn't really get my motor running. Dawn did it well, but other than that (the original, of course), I don't know...
    Maybe I should watch some Mad Max movies...
    Last edited by blind2d; 08-Jul-2011 at 02:57 PM. Reason: Cupcakes, ni**a!

  5. #5
    Rising rongravy's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,570
    United States
    I'm going with the aftermath, with flashbacks to the initial outbreak from time to time...

  6. #6
    Just been bitten Zombie Snack's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    228
    United States
    Either one, as long as the movie is suspensful or frightning or somewhat believable, and not just silly cartoonish crap.
    D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

  7. #7
    Rising Trin's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,685
    United States
    My favorite is Day which is an aftermath movie.
    But Land was an aftermath movie and it's pretty so-so.
    Night was an outbreak movie and I loved Night.
    What is Dawn '78? Kinda between outbreak and aftermath...
    Dawn '04 is outbreak for sure and I loved the start but hated it from midpoint on.
    Diary was an outbreak movie, which weighs heavily against outbreak movies.
    But Survival was an aftermath movie, sorta, which really brings down aftermath movies.

    28 Days Later - outbreak... liked the beginning, hated the end
    28 Weeks Later - outbreak on top of aftermath... really liked the beginning, really hated the end
    Yes, I know... neither 28 Days or Weeks is *really* a zombie movie, sorta maybe kinda

    I Am Legend is aftermath with flash-backs of outbreak, but it's a so-so movie. The early parts of the movie were pretty darned good though. Same with Omega Man. Again, not zombies, I know.

    Here's a very crucial point for me... the best aftermath movies (predominantly GAR movies) are sequels to outbreak movies. That's kinda cheating. The movie gets to immerse immediately into aftermath without giving up the backstory, or trying to shoehorn it in via flashbacks, etc. I really don't think Dawn '78, Day and Land would be as good without the events of the previous movies setting the stage.

    I think it's interesting to note that a lot of movies imho have great openings and bad middles and endings. 28 Days, 28 Weeks, I Am Legend, Dawn '04, Diary, Survival... that's a smattering of both outbreak and aftermath.

    I'm not voting.
    Just look at my face. You can tell I post at HPOTD.

  8. #8
    Walking Dead Legion2213's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    England
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,031
    England
    Tough call...there are elements of both that I just love...watching the world fall apart rocks my socks, but so does watching folk survive in the PZ aftermath.
    Oblivion gallops closer, favoring the spur, sparing the rein - I think we will be gone soon

  9. #9
    Desiderata Satanicus Andy's Avatar
    Administrator

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,532
    England
    Im interested by the aftermath and think theres alot of potential there, but ive yet to see a zombie movie get it right (apart from day) so i would have to say outbreak as there are so many better outbreak movies out there.. i like my zombie movies dark, moody and gory. Putting humour or OTT CGI zombie kills in there, ala zombieland, resident evil or romeros latest entries, really gets under my skin and turns me straight off to a movie too.

  10. #10
    Rising Trin's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,685
    United States
    This will probably get me banned, but I think Land is one of the best aftermath movies out there. It shows us a broad swath of the world both inside and outside the protected area, as well as gives us detailed info on how the people have managed to survive. That was one aspect of Land I loved - you really get to dig into the setting and situation.

    From the perspective of showing life in the aftermath I think Land is better than Day. Day does a good job of portraying their situation in the very brief time we see the outside world, and in the few bits of dialogue they have about their situation, but ultimately Day isn't about showing us how they survive the aftermath. Most of what we know about the situation on the outside comes from what we saw in Night and Dawn.
    Just look at my face. You can tell I post at HPOTD.

  11. #11
    Just Married AcesandEights's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mid-Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    7,479
    United States
    Both have such merits and pitfalls that I don't think I'll vote.

    That said, quality of story and execution is king, for me.

    "Men choose as their prophets those who tell them that their hopes are true." --Lord Dunsany

  12. #12
    Desiderata Satanicus Andy's Avatar
    Administrator

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,532
    England
    Quote Originally Posted by Trin View Post
    This will probably get me banned, but I think Land is one of the best aftermath movies out there. It shows us a broad swath of the world both inside and outside the protected area, as well as gives us detailed info on how the people have managed to survive. That was one aspect of Land I loved - you really get to dig into the setting and situation.

    From the perspective of showing life in the aftermath I think Land is better than Day. Day does a good job of portraying their situation in the very brief time we see the outside world, and in the few bits of dialogue they have about their situation, but ultimately Day isn't about showing us how they survive the aftermath. Most of what we know about the situation on the outside comes from what we saw in Night and Dawn.
    How exactly are they surviving in land? by somehow magically clearing out and fencing off and entire city? by building a super tank and keeping it stocked up and fueled up years after an outbreak?.. maybe its becuase we only ever see about 30 zombies out in the wilderness..

    Do not get me started my friend lol do not get me started..

  13. #13
    Inverting The Cross MikePizzoff's Avatar
    Zombie Flesh Eater

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Age
    39
    Posts
    4,928
    United States
    I, too, love both scenarios, but I'd have to lean toward the aftermath. I love seeing society after it's collapsed, and how the world is in disrepair. I frequent abandoned structures because I love seeing what stuff turns into after human disregard.

  14. #14
    Twitching BillyRay's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mill-wacky
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,117
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by MikePizzoff View Post
    I, too, love both scenarios, but I'd have to lean toward the aftermath. I love seeing society after it's collapsed, and how the world is in disrepair. I frequent abandoned structures because I love seeing what stuff turns into after human disregard.
    With the current popularity of the Zombie genre, I'm surprised Detroit isn't the new Hollywood!
    Those aren't real problems, Sam.


  15. #15
    Being Attacked glazedoverdead's Avatar
    Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Under your bed
    Age
    51
    Posts
    53
    United States
    Totally agree on that point. I do love the way the cities and towns appear in the aftermath. I too frequent abandoned buildings and the like because it does give you that eerie feeling of what it would be like to be wondering around the ghost towns after a zombie apocolypse. Rubble, discarded belongings, trash, emptiness...The world would indeed be such a different place. And too true Billy Ray! That is an ideal city for some serious zombie apocolypse filming.
    Now, if you want to have a good time and you need some p@*$y...you can cut that chicken's head off...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •